See my previous posts in "Tapper has Pars Defect" and "Tapper Suffers Setback".
It's questionable whether he can withstand the rigors of the NFL without surgery since his lumbar spine has an inherent element of instability.
There's also no guarantee that surgery will allow for elite physical performance either. He'd be out for at least 6 months, and may be limited continued pain and myospasm.
See my previous posts in "Tapper has Pars Defect" and "Tapper Suffers Setback".
It's questionable whether he can withstand the rigors of the NFL without surgery since his lumbar spine has an inherent element of instability.
There's also no guarantee that surgery will allow for elite physical performance either. He'd be out for at least 6 months, and may be limited continued pain and myospasm.
What are the odds of a good prognosis (I know without seeing the films) of surgery actually helping him to get on the field.
He would have about a 25% chance of returning to elite status: 40% chance of being a role player for a few years.
This could have been in injury in his adolescence, but he recalls no specific incident; certainly could have been a developmental anomaly.
Would have been much better for him to get this repaired years ago, but that would have also possibly stunted his career growth.
I hate it for the young man and for the team, but I would never count out an elite athlete to be that guy who proves everybody wrong.
No, not the same. That was stenosis.Michael Irvin had a similar condition. It wasn't discovered until he got hurt in Philadelphia.
No, not the same. That was stenosis.
A pars defect is different from spinal stenosis. In fact, players can continue to play with congenital stenosis if they are willing to deal with the discomfort and alarm that happens if they continue to get stingers.It's still an unknown spinal condition that wasn't realized until an injury occurred.
A pars defect is different from spinal stenosis. In fact, players can continue to play with congenital stenosis if they are willing to deal with the discomfort and alarm that happens if they continue to get stingers.
A pars defect can lead to worse spinal cord damage though repeated trauma from my understanding.
I'm not equating them. I'm saying these conditions often aren't known until an injury occurs.
No, you're simply changing what you said instead of simply saying "oh, thanks, didn't know that."
He would have about a 25% chance of returning to elite status: 40% chance of being a role player for a few years.
This could have been in injury in his adolescence, but he recalls no specific incident; certainly could have been a developmental anomaly.
Would have been much better for him to get this repaired years ago, but that would have also possibly stunted his career growth.
I hate it for the young man and for the team, but I would never count out an elite athlete to be that guy who proves everybody wrong.
FWIW -
They had a Dlineman on the radio, 104.3 The Fan, and he stated that he knew of no athlete, with a back injury, that ever really recovers from it and is 100% again.
He stated that JJ Watts career will never be the same with the back injury. He clearly said the JJ Watt era is over.
He's no doctor but front line experience, I guess.
?
It's true that backs never really heal once you hurt them. I can attest to that.
Troy Aikman, Larry Bird, Steve Nash...once that back goes, it's a constant issue to manage from there on.
And isn't Demarcus Lawrence struggling with his back?
Oh yeah. Prior to leaving Dallas.
He's a role player for Denver, at best. He was out injured last year and I believe it was back issues.