Tate To The Boys!!

[AustnIsMySaviour]

We Need to do whatever we can to get this kid in dallas..man is he a special player. You guys think Jerry will target him in round 1 ? Tate plus Austin would be unstoppable

 

[Cowboy Brian]

I wouldn't want Tate in the 3rd round.


Shipley or no Reciever is my method this year, and take him in the 2nd.

 

[AustnIsMySaviour]

I wouldn't want Tate in the 3rd round.


Shipley or no Reciever is my method this year, and take him in the 2nd.

Tate is going to be a far better pro then shipley..no comparison. I can only see Shipley playing in the slot and I think craytons gna be there for a little while

 

[NeonNinja]

Tate would be fine by me, I like him a lot. Can add to the KR/PR game too.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I doubt it with Jerry's history and the fact Roy isn't going anywhere, anytime soon

plus the staff is high on Ogletree

 

[DFWJC]

I doubt it with Jerry's history and the fact Roy isn't going anywhere, anytime soon

plus the staff is high on Ogletree

Bob, I notice you have Vladamir going in round 1....2-3 rounds high don't ya think?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Bob, I notice you have Vladamir going in round 1....2-3 rounds high don't ya think?

I direct thee
http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Rankings.php

 

[CATCH17]

Tate is going to be a far better pro then shipley..no comparison. I can only see Shipley playing in the slot and I think craytons gna be there for a little while

The thing about Shipley is he can hold kicks, return punt or kicks, and is a heck of a slot receiver.

He could do a lot for us and is a good value pick.

 

[AustnIsMySaviour]

The thing about Shipley is he can hold kicks, return punt or kicks, and is a heck of a slot receiver.

He could do a lot for us and is a good value pick.

yeah but whatever Shipley can do Tate can do just as well if not better..PR/KR he can run the WC play the slot or even replace that bum Williams

 

[newlander]

I like tate, but....the poster above is correct. With Austin, RW and his fat contract, Crayton AND ogletree there's simply no reason to target a WR. Ain't gonna happen IMO

 

[TellerMorrow34]

I like Tate alright. I don't like him as a first round pick. No thanks.

And given the choice between the two, and where I feel our biggest needs are, I'd take Shipley over Tate.

 

[Christiann]

I honestly think we have no chance at him, simply because I Don't think we have any room for him with Miles Crayton Williams and Ogletree, and maybe even is Hurd is still around. Anyways I would say I'm almost certain that Baltimore will pick up this kid, Derrick Mason isn't getting any younger and they need a potential #1 receiver for years to come

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

Bal needs a playmaking WR w/ some size. Lafell is perfect

 

[JustDezIt]

thats pretty sneaky R2A. So do you want him or do you not want him?

Way to throw them off. i thought it seemed like you were mostly posting in the draft zone.

 

[UnoDallas]

Bob, I notice you have Vladamir going in round 1....2-3 rounds high don't ya think?

naw thats about right - even tho hes raw - I say late 2 nd

but they are all raw

 

[zrinkill]

We Need to do whatever we can to get this kid in dallas..man is he a special player. You guys think Jerry will target him in round 1 ? Tate plus Austin would be unstoppable

I wouldn't want Tate in the 3rd round.


Shipley or no Reciever is my method this year, and take him in the 2nd.

So you argue with yourself so everyone will take you seriously?

That is amazing.

 

[NeonNinja]

I wouldn't want Tate in the 3rd round.


Shipley or no Reciever is my method this year, and take him in the 2nd.

 

[UnoDallas]

as far as Tate no way does he wear a star next year

we can get what we need in later rounds

like a kick returner

 

[JustDezIt]

So you argue with yourself so everyone will take you seriously?

That is amazing.

haha i thought it was kinda funny myself.

 

[Arch Stanton]

So you argue with yourself so everyone will take you seriously?

That is amazing.

I think he's fortunate that only one of his accounts is banned. I wonder if he has more?