Teams behind us that need OT's

[Killerinstinct]

6. Ravens
7. 49ers
8. Eagles
9. Tampa
10 Gians
11 Bears
13. Dolphins
14 Raiders
16. Lions
18 Colts
19.Bills
20. Jets
22. Texans
23. Vikings
26. Seahawks
27. Packers
30. Panthers
31. Broncos

Obviously there is a cutoff point as far as trading back but there are a whole lot of teams that need an OT. If Tunsil falls and all this talk of teams trading up for QB leaves me thinking that it is possible, we could be in a very nice position to entertain trade offers and a bidding war could ensue when what is considered the highest rated player on a lot of boards falls to within reach.

I love Ramsey and if he is there at 4 I take him

but if the draft falls like this

1. Team trades up to take Wentz
2. Cle Goff
3. SD Ramsey

I will not be disappointed and I think it could result in a bonanza for us. Multiple teams wanting to trade up for Tunsil could result in an overpay.

Trading down and grabbing a guy like Shaq Lawson, Hargreaves, or Zeke and picking up some additional picks would not hurt my feelings at all.

 

[DFWJC]

Not trying to be negative here but Ronnie Stanley is awfully good too. No need to trade up for Tunsil, really. Unless it's a very short trade up that's not too expensive.

I do like the idea of a short trade down with multiple targets though!

 

[Killerinstinct]

Not trying to be negative here but Ronnie Stanley is awfully good too. No need to trade up for Tunsil, really. Unless it's a very short trade up that's not too expensive.

I do like the idea of a short trade down with multiple targets though!

Tunsil will be the higest rated player on some boards and is probably the closest thing to a sure bet in this draft. If he is there at 4, there will be some phone ringing. IMO

 

[4lifecowboy]

6. Ravens
7. 49ers
8. Eagles
9. Tampa
10 Gians
11 Bears
13. Dolphins
14 Raiders
16. Lions
18 Colts
19.Bills
20. Jets
22. Texans
23. Vikings
26. Seahawks
27. Packers
30. Panthers
31. Broncos

Obviously there is a cutoff point as far as trading back but there are a whole lot of teams that need an OT. If Tunsil falls and all this talk of teams trading up for QB leaves me thinking that it is possible, we could be in a very nice position to entertain trade offers and a bidding war could ensue when what is considered the highest rated player on a lot of boards falls to within reach.

I love Ramsey and if he is there at 4 I take him

but if the draft falls like this

1. Team trades up to take Wentz
2. Cle Goff
3. SD Ramsey

I will not be disappointed and I think it could result in a bonanza for us. Multiple teams wanting to trade up for Tunsil could result in an overpay.

Trading down and grabbing a guy like Shaq Lawson, Hargreaves, or Zeke and picking up some additional picks would not hurt my feelings at all.

You left Tennessee off that list they won't be trading back too far and they still would be in need of a OT.

 

[Killerinstinct]

You left Tennessee off that list they won't be trading back too far and they still would be in need of a OT.

True. It depends on who they trade back with(If they do). Philly? Rams? SF? If would limit how far we could move back but would make it even more necessary for a team to trade up knowing that they would have to get ahead of Tenn but in all likelihood he wouldn't make it past 6.

 

[Az Lurker]

If Tunsil is there at #4 I'm flipping him to RT and fielding the best offensive line the NFL has ever seen.

 

[Killerinstinct]

If Tunsil is there at #4 I'm flipping him to RT and fielding the best offensive line the NFL has ever seen.

I could live with that too but I have a sneaking suspicion that we want Shaq Lawson and are looking for a way to trade down and still get him.

 

[Sydla]

It really depends. I suspect guys like the Ravens and 49ers, if they want an OT, probably won't give up a ton to move up to 4 to grab Tunsil, especially if they think Stanley is going to be available. There have been some reports that some teams don't view much of a difference between the two so if the Ravens, for example, are one of those teams, they won't be giving up much to go to 4 to get Tunsil knowing Stanley will likely be there at 4.

 

[Denim Chicken]

If Tunsil is there at #4 I'm flipping him to RT and fielding the best offensive line the NFL has ever seen.

You would draft an RT @ #4? Crazy talk.

 

[Killerinstinct]

It really depends. I suspect guys like the Ravens and 49ers, if they want an OT, probably won't give up a ton to move up to 4 to grab Tunsil, especially if they think Stanley is going to be available. There have been some reports that some teams don't view much of a difference between the two so if the Ravens, for example, are one of those teams, they won't be giving up much to go to 4 to get Tunsil knowing Stanley will likely be there at 4.

The ravens and 49ers probably would only give up a 3rd but other teams behind them would probably give up more. Some teams might not see a huge diff between Tunsil and Stanley but others might. Tunsil has been rated the no 1 player on a lot of rankings for quite a while now. Besides even if there are two of them there are tons of teams that need OT and it is a money position. LT is one of the most important positions on a team.

 

[DFWJC]

Tunsil will be the higest rated player on some boards and is probably the closest thing to a sure bet in this draft. If he is there at 4, there will be some phone ringing. IMO

I think so too. Just mentioning that the 7th rated player , Stanley, is also an OT. Any team considering a trade up may think, for example, Stanley + a 2nd or 3rd rounder > just Tunsil.
But I agree that they would have offers. Tunsil is a stud.

 

[Hardline]

If Tunsil is there at 4 he is my pick.

 

[fortdick]

Take Tunsil and run the ball.