The30YardSlant;3983092 said:Over/Under on the number of posts before a Newman jab is set at three
stasheroo;3983110 said:I think the most 'work' he'll have to do is on his contract.
The 'rumors' were already floated around plenty that if he doesn't 'rework' that, the rest of the 'work' won't matter.
The30YardSlant;3983122 said:Dangerously close to a jab. We'll need a ruling from the judges here...
stasheroo;3983128 said:![]()
But it all honesty, that's what I think it comes down to with Newman.
Bwareinrings94;3983131 said:Each of his workouts start with 10 yards of cushion.
Seriously though, I am rooting for the guy.
Bwareinrings94;3983131 said:Each of his workouts start with 10 yards of cushion.
Seriously though, I am rooting for the guy.
The30YardSlant;3983134 said:I wouldnt mind reworking his contract if he's willing, but I'd very much prefer keeping him at current money than cutting him altogether unless we plan on getting Nnamdi or Joseph. We cannot go into camp with Orlando Scandrick starting at corner.
The30YardSlant;3983122 said:Dangerously close to a jab. We'll need a ruling from the judges here...
Idgit;3983102 said:Hope the doesn't get hurt doing the extra work.
stasheroo;3983144 said:I'm not interested in Scandrick starting either but I think you can do better than paying Newman what he's due to make this year as well. I'd rather take my chances signing Brent Grimes for a lot less than overpaying Newman again.
My first choice would be signing Asomugha to replace him.
cowboyjoe;3983088 said:terencenewman1terence newman
Just finished my workout and about to get a little extra in. Expecting more of myself each an every day
tomson75;3983160 said:You suggested in another thread that you would rather have NA then have another year of excuses of why our secondary sucks. It seems you would rather have the best player on the field at all costs.....
....then this post contradicts that.
Newman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Grimes
I'd put money on Newman restructuring his contract or being cut then resigned to a lesser one anyway...making all of this NA crap go away anyway. No way do I make the same mistake twice by overpaying another CB in his "prime" just to watch his play decline...something we'll likely see with NA.
stasheroo;3983144 said:I'm not interested in Scandrick starting either but I think you can do better than paying Newman what he's due to make this year as well. I'd rather take my chances signing Brent Grimes for a lot less than overpaying Newman again.
My first choice would be signing Asomugha to replace him.
Idgit;3983183 said:What's overpaying for Newman? If he's our best CB and not even paid in the top-20 for his position, is he still overpaid?
And how much are we willing to compromise the pass defense to avoid overpaying a player for his last year as a Cowboy?
Personally, if Newman wants to stay more than a year, I'd rework his deal.
If I can replace him with an equal or better player without killing the cap, I do it regardless. If I can't, there's no way I get rid of the guy this year.
The30YardSlant;3983135 said:So does everyone else's
It's the scheme (or was the scheme anyway)
stasheroo;3983188 said:Is this an accurate statement? I have a hard time thinking that there are 19 corners making better than $8 million per year. But even if there are, Newman's play sure doesn't match his salary, therefore he's still overpaid in my book.
stasheroo;3983188 said:I see where his contract goes to 2014 so I'm not sure what you mean?
