Terminator: Salvation

[Concord]

Extremely disappointed.

 

[Concord]

"American Psycho"... I could watch it a million times. I dig the underdone creepy-funny genre. Probably even more relevant in the wake of the meltdown.

I love that movie too.

What kind of Business Card do you have?

 

[CF74]

C-

Part two was much much better.

 

[MrMom]

Thoroughly disappointed but how much could you really hope for from the writers of Catwoman and director of Charlie's Angels?

The first two blew this out of the water and I preferred three to this.

 

[Yeagermeister]

Thoroughly disappointed but how much could you really hope for from the writers of Catwoman and director of Charlie's Angels?

The first two blew this out of the water and I preferred three to this.

Ouch, I'm glad I didn't go see it now

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

Thoroughly disappointed but how much could you really hope for from the writers of Catwoman and director of Charlie's Angels?

The first two blew this out of the water and I preferred three to this.

Wow.

Ouch, I'm glad I didn't go see it now

Yeah its making me think about waiting for dvd or streaming it online.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Thoroughly disappointed but how much could you really hope for from the writers of Catwoman and director of Charlie's Angels?

The first two blew this out of the water and I preferred three to this.

WOW. Interesting. Now that makes me want ot wait until it hits the $1 venue.

 

[Concord]

Thoroughly disappointed but how much could you really hope for from the writers of Catwoman and director of Charlie's Angels?

They should have never been allowed near this franchise.

 

[TellerMorrow34]

I saw it Sunday night and I rather enjoyed it myself. I thought it was the second best one, behind the first one, and it was well done. A few little things here and there with the story plot that bug you a bit but nothing major and it certainly didn't take away from the movie for me.

I enjoyed it. I'd watch it again.

 

[Pittman4Two]

I saw it Sunday night and I rather enjoyed it myself. I thought it was the second best one, behind the first one, and it was well done. A few little things here and there with the story plot that bug you a bit but nothing major and it certainly didn't take away from the movie for me.

I enjoyed it. I'd watch it again.

Very interesting as I thought T2 was one of the best action movies I've ever seen.

I'll probably see it anyway.

Just wait for The Expendables in 2010. That's gonna be an action flick right there.

 

[the kid 05]

Very interesting as I thought T2 was one of the best action movies I've ever seen.

I'll probably see it anyway.

Just wait for The Expendables in 2010. That's gonna be an action flick right there.

hell yeah it will be if done right with the cast they have it will be the best ever

 

[Kevinicus]

Thoroughly disappointed but how much could you really hope for from the writers of Catwoman and director of Charlie's Angels?

The first two blew this out of the water and I preferred three to this.

That's just crazy talk there.

And I thought McG was awful as well until the end of We Are Marshall when the words, "A McG film" popped up. I was flabbergasted. Now he has made 2 movies in a row that I really like.

 

[Yeagermeister]

Gotta love Hollywood :laugh2:

I just saw a promo hailing it as the #1 ACTION movie

nevermind that Night at the Museum kicked it's *** this week :laugh2:

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Gotta love Hollywood :laugh2:

I just saw a promo hailing it as the #1 ACTION movie

nevermind that Night at the Museum kicked it's *** this week :laugh2:

no movie will ever beat a popular family flick, no matter how good it is
hell, Paul Blart managed to be #1 for weeks on end

and it starred Kevin James!

 

[Yeagermeister]

no movie will ever beat a popular family flick, no matter how good it is
hell, Paul Blart managed to be #1 for weeks on end

and it starred Kevin James!

That's because of the scheduling. It probably opened on a weekend when nothing else was released.

 

[TellerMorrow34]

Family films, if they're released at the right time, will stand a great shot of beating out action flicks, and such, because people like to go to the movies as a family. I wouldn't say they'll always win out, by any means, but they've always got a great shot if the family movie is worth anything at all.

None the less T4 was a pretty darn good movie and I'd certainly watch it again. Unlike 3 which I wouldn't watch again if someone paid me to do it.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

That's because of the scheduling. It probably opened on a weekend when nothing else was released.

it still stayed #1 for like 4 or 5 weeks

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Family films, if they're released at the right time, will stand a great shot of beating out action flicks, and such, because people like to go to the movies as a family. I wouldn't say they'll always win out, by any means, but they've always got a great shot if the family movie is worth anything at all.

None the less T4 was a pretty darn good movie and I'd certainly watch it again. Unlike 3 which I wouldn't watch again if someone paid me to do it.

true, true
they continually play T3 on FX, ugh

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

The beginning show some promise action-wise.

The story was what it was. Bits and pieces of what we already knew mixed with a stretch of a story with Marcus... but it worked(for them).


All in all. It didnt have to be made. None of the sequels really had to be made. Although I did like T2 the best. I would have been content with original.

If not for Liquid Man in T2 - it would have stunk.



I wanted to see more of Moon Bloodgood. Loved her in Journeyman.