aikemirv;1797125 said:
Emmitt did it for how many years.
Don't even bring Emmitt into the comparison.
And TD got injured and couldn't play anymore. He was forced into retirement. What is your point?
Emmitt also
played behind a great line, so to de-value what TD did, based upon the line, is pretty ridiculous. Further, TD got progressively better each year before injury. Not only that, he caught the ball out of the backfield, and averaged around 7.5+ yards per carry, before injury. Emmitt never had a 2000 yard season.
The point is, if TD was still healthy, he would have probably been right up there with the greats. He took Elway over the edge, and won 2 SBs in the process.
Portis averaged 5.5 behind the Denver line and 4.0 since leaving.
1. Portis is a damn good back, and the Commanders win, when he runs well. The first 2 years with the Commanders, he averaged over 1400 yards, averaging around 4.1 YPC. The problem in 2006 was injuries, and this year he is spelled by Betts, which lowers his numbers. He also plays on a team QB'd by Jason Campbell.
But his career average is actually better than Emmit's by .4 yards.
2. Emmitt Smith, behind the Arizona Cardinals averaged around 3 yards per carry, and after they won their last SB, his average dropped to around 4 yards per carry. That correlated with their losing key OL. And the Commanders were just as pathetic as the Cardinals for a majority of those years. They had an aging Brunell who couldn't throw more than 30 yards downfield.
None of this means I'm playing down Emmitt, who is one of the greatest RBs of all time. But facts are facts... TD was a damn good runner.