MysteryIceGuro
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,060
- Reaction score
- 16,379
Looked like Scott Linehan’s boring and inept offense to me. Even ignoring the drops and bad execution by the offensive players, the scheming and play calls were awful.
It really wasn’t into coverage, the corner peeled off his receiver after the throw just because he happened to be in position to see where the ball was going. That can theoretically possible on any throw with condensed space near the goal line and really can’t be anticipated.He had one throw to Ferguson into coverage that I didn't like but the inconsistent accuracy is not a worry given the wet ball all night.
I like that Turpin is getting more touchesWhat were your thoughts on what you saw? This is completely a different scheme from what KELLEN used, I saw a better scheme not necessarily better plays, please give your thoughts
I was not necessarily impressed but I did like his use of Turpin versus Moore's tired jet sweep crapWhat were your thoughts on what you saw? This is completely a different scheme from what KELLEN used, I saw a better scheme not necessarily better plays, please give your thoughts
This was my frustration with the game last night. I hate that we rest our starters like we do in the preseason. Throw in a different style offense and we are just compounding a trend to start slow on offense until things click. Yes, our special teams and defense set is up which was great to see. I am not going to drink the kook aid yet but if we can put up 40 without our passing offense clicking, we could be awfully dangerous all year.I think without the defensive dominance and special teams scoring a TD we’re talking about last nights game much differently.
The run game was fine, but the passing game was by far the weakest link last night.
It has to be better moving forward.
They showed every bit of a team that hasn't practiced the new offense outside of real game time.What were your thoughts on what you saw? This is completely a different scheme from what KELLEN used, I saw a better scheme not necessarily better plays, please give your thoughts
I get you and it was not near bad as I had seen from him at times last season. I just don't like trying to fit throws like that in that situation, wet ball and up big.It really wasn’t into coverage, the corner peeled off his receiver after the throw just because he happened to be in position to see where the ball was going. That can theoretically possible on any throw with condensed space near the goal line and really can’t be anticipated.
I liked what I saw in the rain. What I think they could use is a bruiser at rb to throw in in short yardage, a Marion barber type punisher.What were your thoughts on what you saw? This is completely a different scheme from what KELLEN used, I saw a better scheme not necessarily better plays, please give your thoughts
I hate they got no pre season reps. That along with the weather was certainly a part of it.not much of a rhythm. It worked, but a little bit uncomfortable looking. I’m sure it will get better.
i wonder if the rain had anything to do with how bad the passing offense was??I think without the defensive dominance and special teams scoring a TD we’re talking about last nights game much differently.
The run game was fine, but the passing game was by far the weakest link last night.
It has to be better moving forward.
To those criticizing the offensive approach/playcalling, you need to keep in mind two key factors: One, the early defensive scores, Giants turnovers, and favorable field position; and Two, the driving rain they were playing in. Those two factors affect your offensive play calling.What were your thoughts on what you saw? This is completely a different scheme from what KELLEN used, I saw a better scheme not necessarily better plays, please give your thoughts