Thank God Henry's comin back

Rustinpeace21

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,178
Reaction score
555
Reeves almost cost us the damn game, when McMahon just threw it up there and reggie brown dropped it. I must see i was impressed with A. Glenn last night
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
Everybody keeps saying on TV and the radio that Brown just dropped that ball, but it looked to me like Glenn recovered on an underthrown ball and got his hand in there to break it up? I thought it was a great play. I agree that Henry w need Henry back this week in a bad way. He will be huge this week with Detroits big receivers if he can go!
 

mullet

Active Member
Messages
872
Reaction score
48
alancdc said:
Everybody keeps saying on TV and the radio that Brown just dropped that ball, but it looked to me like Glenn recovered on an underthrown ball and got his hand in there to break it up? I thought it was a great play. I agree that Henry w need Henry back this week in a bad way. He will be huge this week with Detroits big receivers if he can go!

That wasn't Glenn's hand........ It was Jacques Reeves who did interfere with Brown making the catch. I actually think Jacques Reeves did a good job, and he is the reason Brown didn't catch the game winning catch.
 

jaybird

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,484
Reaction score
814
What? think for a minute, didn't Henry do the same thing against somebody- lost the ball in the lights. We miss Henry yes, but I'm glad we have some depth now.
 

Ashwynn

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,777
Reaction score
500
Reeves hit the arm(s) of Brown after he had the ball in his hands (arms) and made him lose the ball. Really he never had full possesion of the ball. It was after getting beat, but he recovered and did his job. Though I dont think he knew it at the time, watch him when he gets up. someone has to come tell him its incomplete.
 

bootyhunta

Active Member
Messages
553
Reaction score
171
He did knock the ball out of Brown's hands.

He must of learned that from Henry.
 

dallasblue05

New Member
Messages
1,286
Reaction score
0
I disagree about Glenn. He didnt do well last night, he was a step behind his man most of the night. He doesnt close very well. And he wouldnt jam a reciever for anything last night. He does better in the nickel so he can blitz or something. I wasnt impressed with him at all.
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
Sorry about that. I thought it was Glenn. I actually thought it was good coverage, but just the classic underthrown ball that is probably the toughest to defend for a DB.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
with henry back 100% I will we got a shot at the big one:dance3:
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
Glen covering either Williams, Mike or Roy would not be a good thing. We need to pressure Harrington into making mistakes that he loves to make
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
dallasblue05 said:
I disagree about Glenn. He didnt do well last night, he was a step behind his man most of the night. He doesnt close very well. And he wouldnt jam a reciever for anything last night. He does better in the nickel so he can blitz or something. I wasnt impressed with him at all.

Glenn was thrown at seven times, allowing three catches for 36 yards and knocking away all four of the other passes thrown at him. I doubt Henry would have done much better than that.
 

Cowboy from New York

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,852
Reaction score
236
Everyone is assuming Henry will be ready to go but have we heard anything for sure on his return? Detroit's Roy Williams had a big day last week and it would sure be more comforting to see Henry out there than a smaller Glenn or an inexperienced Reeves.
 
Top