That ol' Parcells coaching tree ain't half bad

[BlueStar22]

Belichick, Fox, Coughlin.....

 

[Concord]

Belichick, Fox, Coughlin.....

Well that's all fine and well and we can add more to that...BUT the problem is none of them are in Dallas!

That's all I care about.

 

[Rogerthat12]

Well that's all fine and well and we can add more to that...BUT the problem is none of them are in Dallas!

That's all I care about.

Kind response but missed the point of the post I think..

 

[jimmy40]

Belichick, Fox, Coughlin.....

Zimmer, Peyton, Sparano

 

[Billy Bullocks]

Zimmer, Peyton, Sparano

LOL 5 characters

 

[Concord]

Kind response but missed the point of the post I think..

I don't think so...He was saying Parcells has a good coaching tree...It's not debatable...But they are not in Dallas so I really don't care about his coaching tree.

 

[Rogerthat12]

I don't think so...He was saying Parcells has a good coaching tree...It's not debatable...But they are not in Dallas so I really don't care about his coaching tree.

It is immaterial whether they are in Dallas..he has produced some very good NFL coaches

 

[BlueStar22]

It is immaterial whether they are in Dallas..he has produced some very good NFL coaches

show this man what he's won!


A lot better than Turner, Wannstedt, Campo, etc.

 

[Concord]

It is immaterial whether they are in Dallas..he has produced some very good NFL coaches

You said I missed the point...I didn't...I said he had a good coaching tree... I Just don't care...They are not in Dallas...What is that so hard to understand about that?

 

[WoodysGirl]

Belichick, Fox, Coughlin.....

Fox is not part of BP's coaching tree. He was under Jim Fassel in New York.

 

[Concord]

show this man what he's won!


A lot better than Turner, Wannstedt, Campo, etc.

Well those three guys Won Super Bowls HERE!

I don't care what Parcells assistants did else where.

 

[Rogerthat12]

You said I missed the point...I didn't...I said he had a good coaching tree... I Just don't care...They are not in Dallas...What is so hard to understand about that?

This is really simple..his point was that Parcells has produced good coaches BECAUSE he is a good coach...we have the genuine article..why is this confusing you???

Whether you care or not is immaterial to the point of his post...doink!!

 

[Concord]

This is really simple..his point was that Parcells has produced good coaches BECAUSE he is a good coach...we have the genuine article..why is this confusing you???

Whether you care or not is immaterial to the point of his post...doink!!

I agreed with him...So what? Is it helping the Cowboys?...That's what I care about...that's my point.

 

[Rogerthat12]

I agreed with him...So what? Is it helping the Cowboys?...That's what I care about...that's my point.

No need to exchange anymore..he simply made a statement concerning some (excluding Fox..WG is right) of Parcells former coaches having success. The implication is that Bill is a good coach (this hopefully helps us here in Dallas) but the reference and point of the post is simply stating a fact of which you agree.

We agree..lets move on

 

[Concord]

No need to exchange anymore..he simply made a statement concerning some (excluding Fox..WG is right) of Parcells former coaches having success. The implication is that Bill is a good coach (this hopefully helps us here in Dallas) but the reference and point of the post is simply stating a fact of which you agree.

We agree..lets move on

Agreed...Hopefully Parcells can get those kind of assistants here!

 

[Jimz31]

Well...the tree is fine, but how is the root? Is it withering? Enquiring minds really want to know.