G2
Taco Engineer
- Messages
- 25,317
- Reaction score
- 26,847
That wasn't the point.Why in the world are you making this about Dak? Geez, dude, there are thousands of Dak threads you can complain in, why ruin other threads?
That wasn't the point.Why in the world are you making this about Dak? Geez, dude, there are thousands of Dak threads you can complain in, why ruin other threads?
This is how I feel about Diggs summed up pretty well:
We shall see.I think he can figure that out. I have faith in quinn
See since we started this debate I’ve gone back and watch almost every game and all 22 from last year. The answer is. No he wasn’t. He didn’t really allow many game changing plays to his side of the field. And he also from what I watched was never abused, not ever. Not like say Anthony brown vs the raiders. Yes I would trade some interceptions tor yards but again, it’s all relative, a lot of the yards he gave up were not his fault.We shall see.
I wouldn't mind sacrificing INTs for less yards given up.
Those yards given up extend drives. I guarantee Diggs is responsible for a lot more extended drives that led to a TD or FGs than he is for any game changing INTS. I promise you that.
I'm not talking about him specifically allowing a game changing play.See since we started this debate I’ve gone back and watch almost every game and all 22 from last year. The answer is. No he wasn’t. He didn’t really allow many game changing plays to his side of the field. And he also from what I watched was never abused, not ever. Not like say Anthony brown vs the raiders. Yes I would trade some interceptions tor yards but again, it’s all relative, a lot of the yards he gave up were not his fault.
I'm not talking about him specifically allowing a game changing play.
I'm talking about him allowing a catch for 9 yards on 3rd and 8 extending a drive that eventually led to a TD or FG for our opponent.
He gave up a ton of yards. That's why I said that the INTs he got would not offset the type of plays I referenced above.
I know for a fact that he had at least 11 penalties that gave up first downs. Now, add in the little 5 or 9 yard catch here and there on 3rd down that extended drives and I guarantee that Diggs penalties combined with yardage given up lead to more points for our opponents than you'd like to admit. 11 INTs don't cover all that up for everybody. It will some people, but as the coach in the tweet above attested to, it's a big problem that INTs can't hide.
Basically this:
Come on now.Yeah I’m not sure those stats are accurate lol. I watched the film. But it is what it is. Let’s see if he cleans it up this season ya?
Its like ignoring 11 INTs that literally stopped drives, the two he scored TDs or the over 20 passes defended that literally ended plays.See since we started this debate I’ve gone back and watch almost every game and all 22 from last year. The answer is. No he wasn’t. He didn’t really allow many game changing plays to his side of the field. And he also from what I watched was never abused, not ever. Not like say Anthony brown vs the raiders. Yes I would trade some interceptions tor yards but again, it’s all relative, a lot of the yards he gave up were not his fault.
Its like ignoring 11 INTs that literally stopped drives, the two he scored TDs or the over 20 passes defended that literally ended plays.
K - this OP has a strong history( about 90% of post and threads) of trolling Dak which recently was called out . It appears an attempt to troll on other players to diversify.We'd prefer that you do it via PM so we don't have to sit through the interruption of this little spat.
It's not ignoring anything.
It's looking at the whole picture without tunnel vision.
"Hey, look at the INTs, but whatever you do don't look over there!"
Lol. Hey. Stats don’t tell the whole story though. I watched the film too. And I’m telling you. There is no way that almost 50 percent of the receptions diggs allowed were for first downs lol.Come on now.
You're not the only one that watches film. You can't just discount those numbers because you don't like them.
This is the knock that literally everyone has on Diggs. He's too boom or bust and the numbers show it.
90? You're too kind.K - this OP has a strong history( about 90% of post and threads) of trolling Dak which recently was called out . It appears an attempt to troll on other players to diversify.
Anyone attacking Diggs after the season he has is simply trolling.Its like ignoring 11 INTs that literally stopped drives, the two he scored TDs or the over 20 passes defended that literally ended plays.
Why's there no possible way that 45% of the catches Diggs gave up resulted in a 1st down or TD?Lol. Hey. Stats don’t tell the whole story though. I watched the film too. And I’m telling you. There is no way that almost 50 percent of the receptions diggs allowed were for first downs lol.
ALSO. how many were in garbage time? Did this person factor in those numbers?
How many probowl votes did he get, that's from coaches, players and fans.Anyone attacking Diggs after the season he has is simply trolling.
It’s known and has been discussed of Diggs weaknesses in coverage . It doesn’t discount the big season he had. Is there room for improvement , of course .
No. It's not that they don't want to. It's that they don't care like you.90? You're too kind.
If other's don't see it, they don't want to.
The set up on this thread is classic trolling when he said Cowboys fans aren’t going to be happy this CB ranking when most would prob agree.90? You're too kind.
If other's don't see it, they don't want to.
I’m not sure but it’s been widely covered in our local papers and media that Diggs coverage is suspect at times .How many probowl votes did he get, that's from coaches, players and fans.