The Best D line we will face

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Which team right now has it? With our very young O line that will be a tough one. I am worried when we play the Pats; Wilfolk on Costa.
 
I’d go with Detriot. I think the bigger lineman will give this smaller O-line a little more trouble.
 
Detroit, and it isn't even close whatsoever!

Next question.
 
Everlastingxxx;4086088 said:
I’d go with Detriot. I think the bigger lineman will give this smaller O-line a little more trouble.

...I live in Michigan and these guys are NASTY. Wait till you boys see them, it's unreal, and Fairley is still hurt. When he gets back....:cool:
 
yeah detriot could be on the way up as long as their QB stafford stays healthy. But that d-line they have is physical and relentless.
 
Detroit with Suh on Nagy could be very bad; frankly it might be all that Costa and Nagy can do to just keep him from snacking on both romo and felix all by himself.
 
newlander;4086092 said:
...I live in Michigan and these guys are NASTY. Wait till you boys see them, it's unreal, and Fairley is still hurt. When he gets back....:cool:

I don’t follow Detriot but i did watch a few of their preseason games. They look like the real deal. The QBs took some hard shots.

I also think the Commanders look tough on Defense. Well at least from what i saw in preseason.
 
Detroit. If they have Fairley back, we might have to put Arkin at RB just so he can stay in and block.
 
speedkilz88;4086219 said:
Giants have the most depth on the DL.

Tuck is a beast. JPP has good upside, but nothing special yet. Is Kiwi playing LB or DE? How will Osi play with his injury/contract dispute? Giants have a lot of question marks on their DL. I don't think it will be as good as it was last year.

Detroit is definitely gonna make some noise. Suh and Fairley have the potential to be devastating to any offensive line.

Pats should be solid with Wilfork, and possibly and I do stress that's it's only a possibility, a motivated Haynesworth.

St. Louis has a pretty good DL too. Long is underrated. His problem is that he can't seem to "finish" with the sack. IIRC, he lead the NFL in QB disruptions last year (QB hurries, hits etc). He's a good player. Will be interesting to see how Quinn plays too.

Philly should be solid too. Cole is a good player. Babin and Jenkins are coming off good years too. Will be interesting to see if they can replicate.

Tampa is another interesting DL. They took Clayborn and Da'Quan Bowers this year. Both are good players, but let's see how Clayborn goes with his Erb's palsy and Bowers with his bad knee. They're also looking pretty solid at DT with 2nd year guys Gerald McCoy and Brian Price. Both got injured last year, but have huge potential. This line can be among the best in a few years IMO.

So there's quite a few really good DLs that our OL will be facing. Hopefully they're up for it.
 
Detroit looks mean. Suh is dirty and dangerous. If he fouls/slams Romo the O line needs to target his knees.
 
hornitosmonster;4086461 said:
Detroit looks mean. Suh is dirty and dangerous. If he fouls/slams Romo the O line needs to target his knees.

I don't think he's dirty. I think he's just ultra competitive and a bully. A few suh-plex's never hurt anybody! :laugh2:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,678
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top