2ND & 1 AT NYG 18(11:25)
(11:25) S.Barkley up the middle pushed ob at DAL 23 for 59 yards (C.Awuzie).
Breakdown
- Crawford RDE squeezes down to close the inside gap.
- FS Woods was up on this play and played outside contain.
- He initially had inside position on the blocker but moved outside.
- CB Brown was already on the outside.
- Woods should know that Brown has the outside because the outside WR is blocking Woods.
- Brown and Woods both end up covering the outside.
- Crawford had squeezed down the inside gap that Barkley was initially going to run through.
- Vander Esch also covered the same gap that Crawford had closed down.
- That meant no defenders except Heath who was 15 yards back at the point Barkley crosses the line.
- The gap is technically outside of the LT who had moved inside blocking Crawford.
- Giants #88 did block Crawford in the back but that was not the cause of the big gain.
- Vander Esch appears to have been the primary cause.
- X.Woods was likely the next in line for blame.
- Only 1 of Woods or Brown should have stayed outside.
- There was no chance that Heath could make that tackle.
- It is possible that Heath was expected to cut off Barkley's outside path.
- If Heath had cut off the outside then there are defenders to the inside.
Anybody heaping blame on Heath for this play has an agenda.
If Heath could make that open field tackle on Barkley, then Barkley is not very good.
2ND & 1 AT NYG 18(11:25)
(11:25) S.Barkley up the middle pushed ob at DAL 23 for 59 yards (C.Awuzie).
Breakdown
- Crawford RDE squeezes down to close the inside gap.
- FS Woods was up on this play and played outside contain.
- He initially had inside position on the blocker but moved outside.
- CB Brown was already on the outside.
- Woods should know that Brown has the outside because the outside WR is blocking Woods.
- Brown and Woods both end up covering the outside.
- Crawford had squeezed down the inside gap that Barkley was initially going to run through.
- Vander Esch also covered the same gap that Crawford had closed down.
- That meant no defenders except Heath who was 15 yards back at the point Barkley crosses the line.
- The gap is technically outside of the LT who had moved inside blocking Crawford.
- Giants #88 did block Crawford in the back but that was not the cause of the big gain.
- Vander Esch appears to have been the primary cause.
- X.Woods was likely the next in line for blame.
- Only 1 of Woods or Brown should have stayed outside.
- There was no chance that Heath could make that tackle.
- It is possible that Heath was expected to cut off Barkley's outside path.
- If Heath had cut off the outside then there are defenders to the inside.
Anybody heaping blame on Heath for this play has an agenda.
If Heath could make that open field tackle on Barkley, then Barkley is not very good.
I've seen others insist it was Crawford's fault. Like you, I put it on LVE.
But you let Heath off too easily. I think he should have, as you say, cut off the outside to push Barkley in toward the rest of the team. Letting him have the edge was a big problem.
And Heath did have a chance to make the tackle. Not a good chance, but a chance. He could have charged and tried to take Barkley's legs out. Instead he played passive and played to his worst trait, his lateral agility. When Barkley just ran by him, Heath then discovered that Barkley was faster than him too, so he couldn't cut Barkley off with the sidelines either.
The GOAT made all the wrong decisions. The Wolf Hunter screwed up too. Saquon was a tough draw for the first carry of the season. If you're rusty, you're in trouble. We were. Oh well.
For the rest of the game, Barkley had about a 5 yard average. Nothing to get worked up about. I'll give them a Mulligan on the first carry of the season.
They picked a good game to screw up.