The Case for the Full OL Strategy

fanfromvirginia

Inconceivable!
Messages
4,014
Reaction score
164
I don't think people fully realize the leverage here we have with the 'Full OL' strategy, which would, in short, have us signing Nicks, drafting DeCastro and, in the extreme version of the strategy, signing an FA center. Here are the advantages, in no particular order, some of which, IMO, haven't been fully identified or appreciated:

  • We would go from having one of the worst OLs to potentially one of the best in one offseason.
  • We would give Tony Romo the protection he has never, ever had to increase an already very impressive QB rating and fully utilize an impressive list of skill players.
  • Our OL would be relatively very young, giving us time to identify and acquire replacement parts as necessary.
  • Guys like Kowalski, Nagy and Arkin would be penciled in as our depth rather than our starters and be given the time to mature properly.
  • This could play nicely to our new OL coach, who looks on first glance like a very promising hire.
  • The OL could become the cornerstone unit of the future for the franchise, much like the Hogs in the 80s or the DL is for the NYG. We prioritize that unit, which means we are willing to draft and spend a little bit more on that unit than others. You often hear that you shouldn't spend too much money on any one unit but, really, why not? Where is the proof that resources have to be evenly distributed among the various units in order to achieve and maintain success? Great, established teams have different foundations for their success, this is one style that has worked for multiple great teams.
  • It is relatively easy to do this offseason. We only need three players, two of whom are sitting right there -- both Nicks and DeCastro look like they could be available and there are some reasonable FA centers. If Nicks and DeCastro are both available, we really couldn't ask for a better year to implement this strategy or two players who are as close to sure things as you get in the NFL. The same thing can't be said for pass-rushing DEs, #1 CBs, and pass-rushing OLBs.
  • It is financially doable and still leaves money and draft picks to address some of our other issues. Nicks will cost 4.4 million against the cap next year, if I remember Adam's number correctly off the top of my head, and DeCastro will cost what any other 14th selection would. The OC, if we choose to add him into the mix, will cost a couple million against the cap. That leaves (assuming we cut Newman and don't re-sign Spencer, etc.) a solid 15 million of cap space left to spend, on re-signing Robinson and maybe Elam and any other FA, which is no chump change. (This assumes roughly 23 million of cap space, which I believe is consistent with what Adam has posted recently.) It also leaves 7 draft picks (assuming one compensatory pick) to address other needs as well as undrafted FAs, who we have a pretty good recent history of finding good players.
 
nicks or grubbs in FA
decastro in rd 1

regarding OC, there are options in FA and there will be a OC available in the draft in rd 3-4 like brewster (OSU)
 
fanfromvirginia;4381157 said:
I don't think people fully realize the leverage here we have with the 'Full OL' strategy, which would, in short, have us signing Nicks, drafting DeCastro and, in the extreme version of the strategy, signing an FA center. Here are the advantages, in no particular order, some of which, IMO, haven't been fully identified or appreciated:
.[/LIST]

Other unstated advantages are that the team's defense would continue to have an anemic pass rush.

We'd have to sign Spencer to another contract. Ensuring that Ware would have no help from the other side for years to come.

Ratliffe will begin to break down as double teams increasingly begin to blow him off the ball at NT.

Our starting secondary would consist of Jenkins, Scandrick and Allan Ball in the slot??!

So the horific defense that would result would ensure a 4 and 12 season and a high draft pick next year.

Purhaps with high picks next year we could continue to draft Offensive players, neglect the defense and get an even Higher pick in 2014!!!
 
I agree. though I think Killa is a real possibility at center. Watched that kid as much as I could and he really looks like he has serious potential. You put serious quality on each side of him and that helps him a lot as well.

So you could probably do very well there. Sadly the FA centers out there are not all that great and many are old.
 
Nightshade;4381172 said:
Other unstated advantage is that the team's defense would continue to have an anemic pass rush.

We'd have to sign Spencer to another contract. Ensuring that Ware would have no help from the other side for years to come.

Our starting secondary would consist of Jenkins, Scandrick and Allan Ball in the slot??!

So the horific defense that would result would ensure a 4 and 12 season and a high draft pick next year.

Purhaps with high picks next year we could continue to draft Offensive players, neglect the defense and get an even Higher pick in 2014!!!

BS. As was already pointed out in the OP we would still have a lot of money to get FA's for the D. As well as rds 2 and 3 picks. So your post is full of it
 
If we don't have a dominating defense, Dallas is not going anywhere. Offense is a quick fix. If u want long term success u build the defense first. Injuries happen.. Lets say Romo or the running backs get hurt.. Were done.. If we have a good defense we can still be competive..
 
Nightshade;4381172 said:
Other unstated advantages are that the team's defense would continue to have an anemic pass rush.

We'd have to sign Spencer to another contract. Ensuring that Ware would have no help from the other side for years to come.

Ratliffe will begin to break down as double teams increasingly begin to blow him off the ball at NT.

Our starting secondary would consist of Jenkins, Scandrick and Allan Ball in the slot??!

So the horific defense that would result would ensure a 4 and 12 season and a high draft pick next year.

Purhaps with high picks next year we could continue to draft Offensive players, neglect the defense and get an even Higher pick in 2014!!!

Well, we would have, as I clearly stated, 15 million and 7 draft picks to help alleviate the problems on the D. Grab the three interior OL and you really have no other glaring needs on the offense -- everything else can be used on the D in theory.

On edit: I see Burmafrd already got there.
 
Vinnie2u;4381180 said:
If we don't have a dominating defense, Dallas is not going anywhere. Offense is a quick fix. If u want long term success u build the defense first. Injuries happen.. Lets say Romo or the running backs get hurt.. Were done.. If we have a good defense we can still be competive..

I don't call putting a young, great OL in front of DeMarco Murray and Tony Romo a quick fix! That seems like a very odd conclusion. It's a relatively cheap and permanent fix. It's more like an ideal fix.

As for the importance of a dominating D, well, yeah, this is a very good, valid point. But we can start that mend this year with the other 7 picks and the other 15 million.
 
With this strategy, we would have a good O-line essentially for the rest of Romo's career. I don't see you can NOT do this.
 
burmafrd;4381174 said:
I agree. though I think Killa is a real possibility at center. Watched that kid as much as I could and he really looks like he has serious potential. You put serious quality on each side of him and that helps him a lot as well.

So you could probably do very well there. Sadly the FA centers out there are not all that great and many are old.

I agree and could definitely live with Kowalski at C, as long as he is surrounded by Nicks (or possibly Grubbs) and DeCastro.
 
Vinnie2u;4381180 said:
If we don't have a dominating defense, Dallas is not going anywhere. Offense is a quick fix. If u want long term success u build the defense first. Injuries happen.. Lets say Romo or the running backs get hurt.. Were done.. If we have a good defense we can still be competive..

Imagine if Ware went down like Mario did, could we handle it as well as Houston did.....nope. We are totally dependent on him cause we have noone else on this D. Can't believe after watching the games yesterday, some are still neglecting the D.
 
theogt;4381197 said:
With this strategy, we would have a good O-line essentially for the rest of Romo's career. I don't see you can NOT do this.

And into the future as well if you make the OL the cornerstone identity of the team. If you replace Nicks and Free as they get older than you've still got Smith and DeCastro as your wily veterans to protect whomever replaces Romo. Replacing Romo won't be easy, of course, but remember the motley parade of QBs who were successful for the Commanders behind the Hogs?
 
Deep_Freeze;4381201 said:
Imagine if Ware went down like Mario did, could we handle it as well as Houston did.....nope. We are totally dependent on him cause we have noone else on this D. Can't believe after watching the games yesterday, some are still neglecting the D.

Is it really neglect, though? All we OL fetishists are asking for is about 6-8 million in cap room out of roughly 20-25 and the first rounder. You D-ists can have everything else.
 
Where did this sudden love for Kowalski come from?

Is it because he has a "cool" nick name?

He couldn't get on the field behind one of the worst Centers not named Clay Shiver.

Center is a priority. Killer Kowalski and the Klaw isn't the answer.
 
Eddie;4381212 said:
Where did this sudden love for Kowalski come from?

Is it because he has a "cool" nick name?

He couldn't get on the field behind one of the worst Centers not named Clay Shiver.

Center is a priority. Killer Kowalski and the Klaw isn't the answer.

like Miles could not get on the field until Roy was injured
like Free could not get on the field until Colombo was injured
 
fanfromvirginia;4381209 said:
Is it really neglect, though? All we OL fetishists are asking for is about 6-8 million in cap room out of roughly 20-25 and the first rounder. You D-ists can have everything else.

Thats actually a very large portion of the available resources. Most of our FA money and the 14th pick, you don't think thats alot??

There could be 5 players on the D that need to be replaced, meanwhile we drafted 3 OL just last year. I believe some are going overboard with it.
 
Eddie;4381212 said:
Where did this sudden love for Kowalski come from?

Is it because he has a "cool" nick name?

He couldn't get on the field behind one of the worst Centers not named Clay Shiver.

Center is a priority. Killer Kowalski and the Klaw isn't the answer.
I think it's because when he did get on the field he played well.
 
I'm in. To beat the giants you have to be able to beat their DL. We can't do thus without a significant upgrade of our OL.
 
I'm all for fixing this OL but the more you put into the OL you skip on the defense. And as you can see 3 of the 4 teams left have great defense. Baltimore, SF, and NYG are defense first teams.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,678
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top