The complaint last year was that we lost too many players!

[Coogiguy03]

The real complaint could be that Jerry fudged last season, when he had the ideal opportunity to make a definitive decision:
a) All-IN - behind the GB team and enhance in FA.
b) Trade away: Dlaw, Osa, Martin, J-Lew (for draft capital) and reset the CAP, allowing Dak to play out the contract. One year off, and come back with a decent draft haul.....and possibly re-signing Dak, after seeing how he coped with a lesser roster.

We took the worst of both options: didnt retool, allowed the roster strength to dwindle to nothing (meaning we're starting from a low start point) and 'that contract' meaning instead of one year of irrelevancy, we take 2+.

See but either way Dak would still have got what he wants. If he didn't get the bag yet, Dak never gets hurt and he has a record year!!

 

[CowboyoWales]

See but either way Dak would still have got what he wants. If he didn't get the bag yet, Dak never gets hurt and he has a record year!!

So you've turned it into a Dak thread? The two options.......

a) All-IN - behind the GB team and enhance in FA.
b) Trade away: Dlaw, Osa, Martin, J-Lew (for draft capital) and reset the CAP, allowing Dak to play out the contract. One year off, and come back with a decent draft haul.....and possibly re-signing Dak, after seeing how he coped with a lesser roster.

....isnt really Dak based. The problem is that we're where we are because after the GB game Jerry came to a fork in the road, with two definitive routes to take.....he just stopped and took the WORST of both options. Actually if you want to add Dak to the scenario... in a) he gets to go again, with a great roster, or b) we see him (for one year) where he's playing for a contract (I dont think anybody would of expected Championship level or even MVP -2nd place, but you get to see him under pressure).