The Dallas Cowboys are averaging 29.9 PPG with Dak Prescott under center since 2019

[America's Cowboy]

Good regular season numbers. Needs to win in playoffs

You were saying?

 

[USArmyVet]

Even when undeniable proof is presented, you refuse to give Dak credit. Speaks volumes about your character.

I see, so my character gets called into question by someone ignoring the statistical facts I presented all because it negatively impacts your false emotional picture of Dak you and some others are trying to portray? Good luck with that.

 

[USArmyVet]

that's stupid

Of course so as that would be giving credit to someone other than Dak and you and some others simply can't allow that to take place.

 

[America's Cowboy]

You're the one using stats to bolster a lie.
Stats don't show the truth, but we all watched it.

Go back to school, Charlie Brown...

 

[khiladi]

You mean when Kellen Moore became OC, the same guy they claimed is the reason Dak sucks?

 

[khiladi]

According to Mike McCarthy, Kellen Moore scores too quickly and too much and they needed to tone it back.

 

[khiladi]

In 2020, Dak put up a lot of garbage time stats to go 1-4 before breaking his leg. According to his fanboys, if he didn't break his leg, he would have thrown for over 6000 yards that season. Just to put the "scoring" in perspective with Dalton, after the bye, Dallas went 3-2 and Dalton in the 3 wins, with Kellen Moore, put up 30, 41 and 37. Dalton even put up 38 against the Vikings. And before anybody says it was the "defense", sorry Dak fanboys. In this case we are going by scoring, meaning it applies to Dalton.

 

[America's Cowboy]

You're the one using stats to bolster a lie.
Stats don't show the truth, but we all watched it.

Charlie Brown, you're not learning anything getting tricked by Lucy...


Here, study some more gametape...

 

[IslandCowboy]

Because we totally had a terrible run game during that entire time span and Dak really carried the whole team right? RiGht!?

 

[Mac_MaloneV1]

Of course so as that would be giving credit to someone other than Dak and you and some others simply can't allow that to take place.

It's not about giving credit. It's simply explaining where the cutoff is. That said, those ppg are higher with Dak than without, so yes, he should get credit.

What you're doing is seeing something positive about Dak, deciding it's an agenda, and working backwards. Thus, it's stupid.

 

[USArmyVet]

It's not about giving credit. It's simply explaining where the cutoff is. That said, those ppg are higher with Dak than without, so yes, he should get credit.

What you're doing is seeing something positive about Dak, deciding it's an agenda, and working backwards. Thus, it's stupid.

What's stupid is the fact that anyone is celebrating a misleading BS stat wherein selecting 2019 -2022 as the criteria, a time frame that saw Dak miss 17-1/2 out of a possible 63 games...in other words a full season therein comparisons to other QB's are based on a curve seeing as how those QB's did not miss nearly if any at all time equal to Dak's

 

[Mac_MaloneV1]

What's stupid is the fact that anyone is celebrating a misleading BS stat wherein selecting 2019 -2022 as the criteria, a time frame that saw Dak miss 17-1/2 out of a possible 63 games...in other words a full season therein comparisons to other QB's are based on a curve seeing as how those QB's did not miss nearly if any at all time equal to Dak's

yawn.

 

[Nexx]

it's a testament to how good the personnel around Dak has been.

 

[erod]

It's sad there are people who think this matters.

 

[CT Dal Fan]

Meanwhile, take him away and put Rush in and we go 5-1.

PPG does not equal winning. Dak is living, breathing, proof of that.

Give me 24 against the 49ers 2 years ago and 20 against them last season year and let’s move on in the playoffs.

PPG means squat.

The Cooper Rush argument is laughable. PPG does not equal wins argument is even more hilarious. Know what teams were worst in scoring last year? The Broncos, Jets, Colts, Texans, and Rams. How many games did they win? Also Dallas was 4-1 (not 5-1) with Rush and they scored NINE offensive touchdowns TOTAL in the five games Rush started.

Let's take those (less than) two touchdowns per game last season and see if the Cowboys beat the Bears, Giants, Texans, and Eagles with Rush the rest of the way. Maybe an 8-9 season without Dak.

What the Cowboys did with Rush was not sustainable and the Eagles proved it in Rush's final start. The defense and special teams carried the team for as long as it could. I would love for real NFL GM's and coaches to read this board just to see the reaction.

If you have an anti-Dak agenda, fine, have fun. But when you make up things like this it's an absolute joke and does nothing to support your argument. More points against the 49ers would have been great but is that all on Dak?

The only teams to go for more than 20 against them were the Chiefs (44), Falcons (28 with a defensive score in there I believe), the Raiders (34 in a loss in a game the 49ers didn't need) and Seattle scored 23 against them in a loss the week before the Dallas game. That's it.

 

[noshame]

Thank God we got rid of the offensive coordinator Dak will have no trouble keeping that average this year, right?

 

[FVSTONE]

If this is true, then what happen to the Cowboy and 9er playoff game???????

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

The Cooper Rush argument is laughable. PPG does not equal wins argument is even more hilarious. Know what teams were worst in scoring last year? The Broncos, Jets, Colts, Texans, and Rams. How many games did they win? Also Dallas was 4-1 (not 5-1) with Rush and they scored NINE offensive touchdowns TOTAL in the five games Rush started.

Let's take those (less than) two touchdowns per game last season and see if the Cowboys beat the Bears, Giants, Texans, and Eagles with Rush the rest of the way. Maybe an 8-9 season without Dak.

What the Cowboys did with Rush was not sustainable and the Eagles proved it in Rush's final start. The defense and special teams carried the team for as long as it could. I would love for real NFL GM's and coaches to read this board just to see the reaction.

If you have an anti-Dak agenda, fine, have fun. But when you make up things like this it's an absolute joke and does nothing to support your argument. More points against the 49ers would have been great but is that all on Dak?

The only teams to go for more than 20 against them were the Chiefs (44), Falcons (28 with a defensive score in there I believe), the Raiders (34 in a loss in a game the 49ers didn't need) and Seattle scored 23 against them in a loss the week before the Dallas game. That's it.

So the Eagles ending Rushs 5 game win steak proved that he’s not sustainable but Dak failing every year for 7 years is?

Dak fans are not Cowboys fans.

 

[CT Dal Fan]

What's stupid is the fact that anyone is celebrating a misleading BS stat wherein selecting 2019 -2022 as the criteria, a time frame that saw Dak miss 17-1/2 out of a possible 63 games...in other words a full season therein comparisons to other QB's are based on a curve seeing as how those QB's did not miss nearly if any at all time equal to Dak's

Yet people will still reference some bad Dak games from the 2017-18 time frame and use it as proof he sucks, like he is still the same player he was six or seven years ago.

Cherry picking stats works both ways so long as they support the agenda.

 

[quickccc]

Both losses have been explained many times.

whose doing the explaining ..?