The dilemma, for cowboy fans this season

[Whirlwin]

it’s about a lot of interesting points.

Somebody who understands the game, thank you

 

[Whirlwin]

Dilemma? I didn't see you proclaim a dilemma. I just saw a bunch of questions.
LOL-JK.

Yes maybe the heading was wrong.

 

[plasticman]

Cooper Rush does just enough to beat mediocre teams. That's not the Eagles.

 

[Doomsday101]

Cooper Rush does just enough to beat mediocre teams. That's not the Eagles.

Rush will have to do a bit more.

 

[nyc-cowboy]

The only dilemma will be wether Moore sticks to the running game when Dak gets back -they need Dak to stay with-in himself and not try to be a Payton Manning flinging the ball all over the place.

 

[FTWayne]

Let's down play Rush more, when tub gimp looked like crap against TB

 

[jujoboys]

Cooper rush, we have been winning, but is he the reason. What happens if he plays and we beat the eagles,?? What happens if he loses against the Eagles.
Dakota Prescott, if he plays against the Eagles and loses.?? If he plays and We beat the Eagles,end of story.
Ezekiel Elliott, he’s not as explosive as Tony Pollard but we don’t have a passing game without him
Tony Pollard, I believe the Defense, knows it’s a running play if he’s in the backfield without Elliot.
Yes there is no agenda here. I’m simply stating what I’ve been reading on this form.
I personally have no issues as long as we keep winning. I do want the best talent to be on the field at all times, but we know that’s just not possible

Just go out and beat the damn Eagles, go cowboys

It's not our dilemma. We don't have a choice about who plays and who doesn't. As long as we are winning I don't really care who is on the field. I'm a fan of the Cowboys not a fan of individual players.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Cooper rush, we have been winning, but is he the reason. What happens if he plays and we beat the eagles,?? What happens if he loses against the Eagles.
Dakota Prescott, if he plays against the Eagles and loses.?? If he plays and We beat the Eagles,end of story.
Ezekiel Elliott, he’s not as explosive as Tony Pollard but we don’t have a passing game without him
Tony Pollard, I believe the Defense, knows it’s a running play if he’s in the backfield without Elliot.
Yes there is no agenda here. I’m simply stating what I’ve been reading on this form.
I personally have no issues as long as we keep winning. I do want the best talent to be on the field at all times, but we know that’s just not possible

Just go out and beat the damn Eagles, go cowboys

Why do you people get so confused by the winning and losing? Its very very easy to tell who plays well and who doesnt. Dont let the W or L confuse you.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Wow I don't really think there's any dilemma we're four and one with our starting quarterback out the last four games.

Man you got an awful lot of questions here.

If Cooper Rush beats the eagles they will leave him playing until he loses.

If Rush loses to the eagles they will be quick to proclaim Dak the starter against the Lions.

If Dac plays against the eagles and loses now there's a dilemma.
If he wins against the eagles that is what he gets paid 40 million to do beat the best of the best he will be doing what is expected of him especially with this defense.

Okay I've answered enough questions somebody else take over please

Answered them poorly. Lets just be glad that there are people in charge that can tell the difference between someone playing well or poorly without looking at the final score.

 

[zrinkill]

I can’t explain it any better than. Basic football. I guess the problem is there’s no agenda just real football

But I do not understand what you are saying is a dilemma...... You just said a bunch of stuff going on this year.
But ok ..... I agree ..... Just win.

 

[Cowfan75]

The only dilemma will be for Jerry. His backup QB is playing better than his 40 million Golden Boy. While that's a win for us, it's not that easy for Jerry, who would rather waste an entire season (or three) forcing a lesser QB on the team just to not look stupid for doing what many of us knew was a huge mistake.

 

[Established1971]

Cooper rush, we have been winning, but is he the reason. What happens if he plays and we beat the eagles,?? What happens if he loses against the Eagles.
Dakota Prescott, if he plays against the Eagles and loses.?? If he plays and We beat the Eagles,end of story.
Ezekiel Elliott, he’s not as explosive as Tony Pollard but we don’t have a passing game without him
Tony Pollard, I believe the Defense, knows it’s a running play if he’s in the backfield without Elliot.
Yes there is no agenda here. I’m simply stating what I’ve been reading on this form.
I personally have no issues as long as we keep winning. I do want the best talent to be on the field at all times, but we know that’s just not possible

Just go out and beat the damn Eagles, go cowboys

he has not really controlled a game and won with his passing. Last year we had two 50 point games and another 43-3 game, our offense was pretty epic, and we would have to see what may happen with Dak back, even if we are 5-1 and Cooper has won 5 in a row beating the champs and last undefeated teas at their homes. Dak is coming back

 

[Whirlwin]

But I do not understand what you are saying is a dilemma...... You just said a bunch of stuff going on this year.
But ok ..... I agree ..... Just win.

There’s a dilemma because 50% of the cowboy fans are split between Prescott and rush. That’s where the dilemma is between them. They both want to say I told you so. I only care that the Cowboys are winning

 

[Whirlwin]

Why do you people get so confused by the winning and losing? Its very very easy to tell who plays well and who doesnt. Dont let the W or L confuse you.

Confused, not at all. I know exactly why were winning. I know exactly how to beat the Eagles. If they keep the same game plan we will lose to them. They’re going to have to put the ball A little bit more in Cooper Rush hint. If we’re going to beat them. We’ve been averaging 17 points a game, they’ve been Averaging 27. We need one of those field goals to be a touchdown to beat them

 

[diamonddelts]

Cooper rush, we have been winning, but is he the reason. What happens if he plays and we beat the eagles,?? What happens if he loses against the Eagles.
Dakota Prescott, if he plays against the Eagles and loses.?? If he plays and We beat the Eagles,end of story.
Ezekiel Elliott, he’s not as explosive as Tony Pollard but we don’t have a passing game without him
Tony Pollard, I believe the Defense, knows it’s a running play if he’s in the backfield without Elliot.
Yes there is no agenda here. I’m simply stating what I’ve been reading on this form.
I personally have no issues as long as we keep winning. I do want the best talent to be on the field at all times, but we know that’s just not possible

Just go out and beat the damn Eagles, go cowboys

According to 3rdeyeWarrior, Elliot it is the best running back in the NFL. LMAO.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Confused, not at all. I know exactly why were winning. I know exactly how to beat the Eagles. If they keep the same game plan we will lose to them. They’re going to have to put the ball A little bit more in Cooper Rush hint. If we’re going to beat them. We’ve been averaging 17 points a game, they’ve been Averaging 27. We need one of those field goals to be a touchdown to beat them

Winning doesn't make a player better and losing doesn't make a player worse. They play how they play. The success or failure of the team is used by layman's to analyze individual players when it has little to do with it.

If Cooper Rush throws for 450 yards and 3 TD's and we lose, its still an incredible game by Rush we should use that as ammo to decide whether to keep him starting.

Likewise if he throws for 100 yards and we win it was a bad game by him and he had little to do with the success. That should also be taken into account when deciding whether to keep him starting.

 

[Whirlwin]

Winning doesn't make a player better and losing doesn't make a player worse. They play how they play. The success or failure of the team is used by layman's to analyze individual players when it has little to do with it.

If Cooper Rush throws for 450 yards and 3 TD's and we lose, its still an incredible game by Rush we should use that as ammo to decide whether to keep him starting.

Likewise if he throws for 100 yards and we win it was a bad game by him and he had little to do with the success. That should also be taken into account when deciding whether to keep him starting.

I agree with that so what’s your point. I don’t recall seeing anything different

 

[Whirlwin]

Winning doesn't make a player better and losing doesn't make a player worse. They play how they play. The success or failure of the team is used by layman's to analyze individual players when it has little to do with it.

If Cooper Rush throws for 450 yards and 3 TD's and we lose, its still an incredible game by Rush we should use that as ammo to decide whether to keep him starting.

Likewise if he throws for 100 yards and we win it was a bad game by him and he had little to do with the success. That should also be taken into account when deciding whether to keep him starting.

I’m kind of happy Prescotts not playing. If he was to lose, this game the Fan base would never want to see him again. If Cooper Rush loses it would be like it’s OK he won Five in a row. I think the franchise knows the right thing to do is to start Cooper Rush. Even though Prescott isn’t ready

 

[Irv88]

Nothing wrong with having 2 qb’s who can win in this league.

it could be worse, you could be a Steelers fan and lose every week with your 2 qb’s.

 

[CowboyRoy]

I agree with that so what’s your point. I don’t recall seeing anything different

did you not start this thread? The point of it being we have a dilemma if Rush wins again?