The fallout from the Micah trade feels a bit like Herschel

Micah was as every much part of that, if not more.
Maybe, yeah.

In a way he and Jerry were peas in a pod, but it was also probably the downfall of things.

Regardless, the team needed the resources they got for him more than they needed him alone. The deal works in my mind even if GB wins more than Dallas does over his career.
 
Would you rather have.....?

Micah Parsons

or

Kenny Clark, Quinnen Williams, Malachi Lawrence, Rashan Gary, and Ottito Ogbonnia

That's what the trade and subsequent offseason decisions essentially brought with the money Micah wanted.

And it provided the depth to make the Osa trade possible that brought Barham.

It may be early, but this has shades of the Herschel Walker trade about it.

Best offseason roster management we've seen around here in a long, long time.
Seems right but the jury is still out really. If Micah helps get the Packers to the SB or something and wrecks the game, it's going to feel like a disaster. That's a BIG if though. If Micah goes on to have a rash of injuries for the next few years or is not the same player after the last set of injuries, we easily won the trade..
 
THIS was my 100% concerned about keeping him on a huge long-term contract.
Which would not have been as huge had Jerry signed him after Year 3. $34M was the going rate then. The same $34M we tried to trade for in Crosby. Conveniently forgotten and Micah's eventual pay exaggerated every time this trade is mentioned.

People hated Micah once it was time for him to get paid so I understand the absolute need to back the front office here, just like they would in contract negotiations. But to excuse Jerry's emotion-over-business episode that cost us value and pretending "this was the plan all along" is convenient. If we can break even it'll be lucked into once again. Same as getting Micah himself and now Downs.
 
I don’t remember ever having a coach or coordinator fire in the middle of the season
I am trying to think of any and cannot
pretty much every other GM will drop the hammer when historically bad things are happening
not our wonderful NGM
 
Which would not have been as huge had Jerry signed him after Year 3. $34M was the going rate then. The same $34M we tried to trade for in Crosby. Conveniently forgotten and Micah's eventual pay exaggerated every time this trade is mentioned.

People hated Micah once it was time for him to get paid so I understand the absolute need to back the front office here, just like they would in contract negotiations. But to excuse Jerry's emotion-over-business episode that cost us value and pretending "this was the plan all along" is convenient. If we can break even it'll be lucked into once again. Same as getting Micah himself and now Downs.
Micah wanting to sign for 34 million is a myth.
 
If things were on the up and up that was the going rate. Malpractice not to try to sign your 3-time All-Pro.
This was on both sides; NGM started it, no doubt of that. But MP acting like he did about it just finished it.
 
Let me say that this is revionist history crap lol.


It was a small minority on this site that actually said the trade was ok at the time.

Now everyone is saying “I never wanted to sign him” lol.

I was fine with the trade but both things can be true.

Trading Micah was a mistake.
The timing was a mistake.
It made our team worse.
We conceded a year.

What they deserve credit for is making the best out of a messed up situation that they created.

But they had no plan and they wanted to keep Micah they traded him because your GM feelings got hurt and they skinned the narrative that they can sign so many more guys now and all they did was was bring back questionable players like Osa, Bland and Ferg…and trade for a questionable edge in Gary.
 
This was on both sides; NGM started it, no doubt of that. But MP acting like he did about it just finished it.
All irrelevant if he were taken care of after Year 3, as is custom for a blue chip talent. We didn't.
 
I don’t get the math by the OP. Why does it have to be Micah or those 5 players? Why does we let Jerry off the hook for not going hard for a guy like Q while you still have a Micah Parsons?i
 
LOL....Wade Phillips ( remember that's how we ended up with Garrett)
Yeah I thought he meant assistants but I for sure remember Wade and then I think Garrett might’ve went 5-3 or something….

If I’m not mistaken those Wade defenses started getting torched by anyone and I think David Garrard doing it was the nail in the coffin.
 
I don’t get the math by the OP. Why does it have to be Micah or those 5 players? Why does we let Jerry off the hook for not going hard for a guy like Q while you still have a Micah Parsons?i
The argument is they couldn’t afford Quinnen if Micah is here. Do I believe that? No. But we know their argument is they like their guys and I don’t see them treading for Quinnen if Micah was here. They would’ve drafted a nose.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
475,026
Messages
14,577,173
Members
24,214
Latest member
whoami2066
Back
Top