The Great Running Back Debate

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
Like many of you, I am concerned about the Cowboy’s perceived Running Back by committee approach in 2015. After last season, I honestly thought anybody who actually sat down and watched every game understood that much of what was accomplished last year hinged on the running game – every aspect of the Cowboys football team was made better by how well the running game worked.

Some believe Murray benefitted more from the OL. Despite setting the new team record for rushing yards in a season, I do not recall a single game that I walked away from believing that Murray squeezed every last yard he could out of every run. Given that line of thinking, it wasn not too far-fetched to believe that were the Cowboys able to find a guy with a little better vision and better overall speed, behind that offensive line the Cowboys would be unstoppable.

Still others believe that it was the OL that benefitted from the simultaneous threat of the pass vs. the run. It was a true pick your poison situation for the opposing defense last year, meaning much of their game-planning was dependent on reading and reacting post-snap; ill-conceived pre-snap reads against the Cowboys is what led to a good portion of their pay-dirt last season. Therefore, because defenses were continuously off-balance, the offensive line enjoyed a split-second of indecision and this clearly made them look like world-beaters in many situations.

Don’t get me wrong; I’m not discounting the efforts of any one entity - be it the OL or Demarco Murray. I’m merely pointing out that both benefitted from each other – both made each other look better than what they deserved to look like…if that makes sense.

So with all of that having been said, the majority of the so-called experts (including my admittedly not-so-expert-opinion) fully expected the Cowboys to find a guy who could at the very least replace a little of Demarco’s production…and most also agreed that despite having signed McFadden, the search would continue in the draft.

Flash forward to the draft. With the first pick at 27 the Cowboys drafted Byron Jones. Some said this was a reach, some said this was a steal given where in the first round he was taken. Regardless of what you believe, I think most will agree that any RB left at that point, with Gordon and Gurley already gone, would have definitely been a reach.

So at this point, while I was disappointed the “great running back situation” had not been addressed in day 1, I at least understood the move. The Cowboys did address a glaring need and many would agree he was the Best Player Available, so I was still content.

Day 2 of the draft saw a player considered the best pass rusher available in the draft fall to the Cowboys at the 60th pick overall. At one time considered a top 15 talent, knuckleheadedness led to his considerable drop. Despite that, most agree the 60th overall pick was worth the gamble for a team desperate for a pass-rush last season. I’m reluctant to argue against that. Yes, that still meant the running back situation had not been addressed, but once again this was considered a need, especially with the uncertainty of Hardy's suspension situation, so while still uncomfortable with the Cowboys current stable of backs , I understood the move.

Day 3 is where the wheels completely fell off. Every RB worthy of the Cowboys consideration was taken before the Cowboys had an opportunity at 91. Don’t get me wrong, I get that Langford and Ajayi were still available, but to that I would argue that neither of those players or other miscellaneous drafted late RB would be an actual improvement over what the Cowboys already have. Langford is Dunbar/McFadden 2.0. Ajayi remind’s me a lot of JoRan.

Many are still clamoring for a move involving AP which I am resolutely against. He is 30, a year removed from football, would demand a contract of, at least, 3 years 8 mil at minimum, would demand extremely valuable draft picks/players being sent to the Vikings, and would be running on two surgically repaired knees. All the signs and symptoms of disaster waiting to happen are there. Why even Dez is blind to this is beyond me.

Don’t get me wrong, AP may have a good year or two in him…if any Running Back does at 30, he would. But still, the risk versus reward doesn’t add up to good business sense, in my opinion.

In the wake of all this, the Cowboys were able to hush up much of the white-noise in regards to Running Back with the stunning and sudden acquisition of La’el Collins. Clearly, his addition help’s the assertion that any running back should be able to find success behind the offensive line…but still. For me, I still have reservations, misgivings and am back to that old territory that all Cowboys fans should be familiar with post-draft – cautiously optimistic.

Granted, I would give this offseason as a whole an A -. They seemingly improved at various levels on Defense, namely the defensive line. They were able to miraculously add what many would consider three 1st round caliber talents in the draft. With the return of Sean Lee, they are adding what many would consider a first round pick, should you be kind enough to forget about the injury issues. They exercised a great deal of patience throughout Free Agency and ignored the itch to make sweeping massive changes/additions to the team that will cost the Cowboys in the long-run for the exception of the Romo restructure.

All in all, this Cowboys team look’s the best it has since 1995. The big question is will the Cowboys regret not making more of a concerted effort to replace Demarco Murray?
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
I believe they will regret not resigning Murray. He will be fine for the next 2-3 seasons.
 

JohnsKey19

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,694
Reaction score
18,723
I believe they drafted Randle in the first place with the objective of him replacing Murray. McFadden's is here as an insurance policy who can pass protect.

Agreed

Murray is a top 5-7 player at RB. So no, on paper the running game probably will not be as good as the 2014 season. Randle is a talented runner as is DMC. Neither individually is Murray. But the 2 combined can produce similar results to what the running game produced last season. You obviously can't predict injuries or Randle winding up on the 11 PM news during game week. The Cowboys are approaching this assuming relatively healthy seasons and Randle showing signs of maturity. Otherwise they clearly would've made a bigger move at RB by now.
 

JoeBoBBY

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
1,691
When everybody knows the run is coming, I think the opposing defense will be able to stop DMC/Randle.

I think we see Romo drop back and pass more, not trusting those guys in crunch time. As a result, there will be more sacks and more coverage inching towards Dez and others.

How big of a difference? I am not sure, but I do think it will be noticeable and effect the TOP...
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,036
Reaction score
37,194
The big question is will the Cowboys regret not making more of a concerted effort to replace Demarco Murray?

What gets me about this question is all the fans who answer either yes or no. I don't understand how a conclusion of success can be reached based on these players' past performances. There's not enough evidence to support it.

There is enough past evidence to say failure is more probable than success with this group, but we don't know how factors such as the play of the line and the passing game will affect the play of the running game.

I firmly stand in the camp of those who believe we should have done more to try to keep this from ending in failure, but I can't discount the possibility of success. It just blows my mind that some feel they can, or certain that these backs will succeed.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
People wishing for a a bell cow rb do so out of vanity and not because they think it is necessarily necessary.

It felt good last year to soak in all the Murray and in effect Cowboys praise.

It was fun to watch records fall and root for 100 yard games.

Unfortunately there are a limited number of special running backs on this Earth. Those guys should be drafted and later paid.

For most everyone else without that special guy....a committee isn't just effective it's superior.

If we can get AD...who is special....ship out the future pick and let's make a run that way. If he isn't...well...an Ajayi in the 5th or an Allen in the 4th wasn't the answer. They were just an answer. A sexier but not necessarily better answer.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
Nice write up. Lots of effort put into that. To answer your question, no.

To be honest, not a whole lot of effort at all. The OP was just all the ideas that have been rolling around my head seeking escape. Overall, I feel good about the offseason, but the effort or lack thereof at sowing up the running attack has left me somewhat concerned despite all of the other wins the Cowboys have had in this offseason.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
I believe they drafted Randle in the first place with the objective of him replacing Murray. McFadden's is here as an insurance policy who can pass protect.

The Cowboys have clearly placed their confidence in one of them, but I'm not leaning towards Randle considering his off-the-field issues. For me, it's between Ryan Williams and McFadden.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
When everybody knows the run is coming, I think the opposing defense will be able to stop DMC/Randle.

I think we see Romo drop back and pass more, not trusting those guys in crunch time. As a result, there will be more sacks and more coverage inching towards Dez and others.

How big of a difference? I am not sure, but I do think it will be noticeable and effect the TOP...

That is my biggest fear.
 

ufcrules1

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,652
Reaction score
3,800
I believe they drafted Randle in the first place with the objective of him replacing Murray. McFadden's is here as an insurance policy who can pass protect.

This is madness. Randle the underwear and cologne thief? Haha.... Mcfadden, although a proven loser in Oakland will be our starter here unless we get AP. Randle will get him water on the sidelines and then get a carry here an there.
 

DanTanna

Original Zone Member
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
3,298
Murray was successful in college
Randle was MORE successful in college
Murray was successful for a season in the NFL
Randle has not been given his shot yet.

We will see.
 

BARRYRAY

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,418
Reaction score
127
You guys have patience.Jerry didn't put this oline together for these guys.We will make a deal but it likely comes later when there are more cuts.I do believe in Jerry and the brain trust here.They got it going on here.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
This is madness. Randle the underwear and cologne thief? Haha.... Mcfadden, although a proven loser in Oakland will be our starter here unless we get AP. Randle will get him water on the sidelines and then get a carry here an there.

That you have to bring up off the field issues to detract from Randle speaks to me in the opposite manner that you intended. In general appealing to ridicule such as is the entirety of your post is a waste of time.
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
People wishing for a a bell cow rb do so out of vanity and not because they think it is necessarily necessary.

It felt good last year to soak in all the Murray and in effect Cowboys praise.

It was fun to watch records fall and root for 100 yard games.

Unfortunately there are a limited number of special running backs on this Earth. Those guys should be drafted and later paid.

For most everyone else without that special guy....a committee isn't just effective it's superior.

If we can get AD...who is special....ship out the future pick and let's make a run that way. If he isn't...well...an Ajayi in the 5th or an Allen in the 4th wasn't the answer. They were just an answer. A sexier but not necessarily better answer.

RBBC is not superior in any way. A RB has to get in the flow of the game to be at his best. RBBC can not set the tone of an offense either . This is not a direct quote, but it is close to comments made by Emmitt and other great RBs. I agree with them 100%.
 
Top