Rayman70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,336
- Reaction score
- 46,688
BellToo old. Still available for a reason. Which young player are you cutting?
BellToo old. Still available for a reason. Which young player are you cutting?
I would.3rd rounder. Can we pump the breaks a bit?
No wayBell
He was a beast in college. There is tape of him smacking OGs at the line of scrimmage to blow up run plays.
Agreed why even ask him or his idiot son.Jerry's player evaluations mean nothing to me.
Coog what is a "strong muscle face?"The guy just has the LOOK!! He has that strong muscle face, reminds me a lot of Takeo Spikes
Don't make it a habit
Let's see him a bit during the rams
You may need to go outside and clear your head Ram.Yes, did the same with Parsons.
Nothing wrong with my head. We got 3 solid rookies in Downs, Lawrence, and Barham. It looks like Phil Mafah has a chance at being a solid player too.You may need to go outside and clear your head Ram.
Clowney hasn’t attended an off season program in years. Parker and Schottenheimer wanted this complete defensive rebuild to start with the voluntary workouts in April.Now keep surrounding him with good players. We need winters out there with him. Id honestly bring in a vet like Bobby wagner right now. Resign Clowney. Id even look at adding another vet cb
it would take me all day to explain, check back with me yesterday ok??Coog what is a "strong muscle face?"
Do you remember the Parsons hype?As someone who is a fan of the Barham pick I'm glad he's impressing early on, but I also throw out 90% of what I hear about the first couple weeks of camp. When I hear hype around a rookie I'm quickly reminded of this thread
I like facts...OLB is his natural position. Cowboys said after the draft they want to see him at MLB..
There were some folks questioning his ability to play LB because he was pressed into service as an edge rusher three games into his senior year due to to the teams weak pass rush and that was what was listed on draft day
38 games at OLB
7 games at EDGE

And I am sure others who ended up not being so beastly. Let's be honest about it, you have, through the years, used that term more generously than most on here (not saying there is anything wrong with the positivity... just the percentage of accuracy and certainty you are referencing throughout this thread, Nostradamus).Yes, did the same with Parsons.
they are the one drafting incase people forget,we don't have a GM.Agreed why even ask him or his idiot son.
I don't remember using the term beast very often. Barham is a beast.And I am sure others who ended up not being so beastly. Let's be honest about it, you have, through the years, used that term more generously than most on here (not saying there is anything wrong with the positivity... just the percentage of accuracy).
Yes but I think there is a massive difference in hyping a top 10ish pick and a top 100ish pick.Do you remember the Parsons hype?
Barham should have gone higher. I think the Cowboys would have taken him much higher.Yes but I think there is a massive difference in hyping a top 10ish pick and a top 100ish pick.
I like Barham but we know nothing yet. Hyping a parsons or a Caleb downs I’m all for. The mid round athletic positional tweener types often look good this time mid year. I’m going to wait at least until full pads go on and everyone is at full speed before evaluating a front 7 player too much.
