TWOK11
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,074
- Reaction score
- 11,289
If the Zeke "fumble" isn't inconclusive, what's the point of replay at all? That's the type of play it's designed to overturn.
If you're going to allow a corner to hold a receiver THE ENTIRE game and call 1-2 of them, why call any at all? And why the next game call 50+% of them? And why call it differently between the two teams?
If you're going to allow OL to fire off downfield immediately to block for their RB who is running an underneath zone route, why have an illegal man downfield rule at all? The Saints did this FIVE TIMES and it wasn't called once. It's an entirely pointless rule, much like the pick rule is for the Patriots.
Our offense didn't play well, but this kind of stuff just takes so much of the fun out of watching. Coaches can't even plan around it BECAUSE it's inconsistent.
If you're going to allow a corner to hold a receiver THE ENTIRE game and call 1-2 of them, why call any at all? And why the next game call 50+% of them? And why call it differently between the two teams?
If you're going to allow OL to fire off downfield immediately to block for their RB who is running an underneath zone route, why have an illegal man downfield rule at all? The Saints did this FIVE TIMES and it wasn't called once. It's an entirely pointless rule, much like the pick rule is for the Patriots.
Our offense didn't play well, but this kind of stuff just takes so much of the fun out of watching. Coaches can't even plan around it BECAUSE it's inconsistent.