TruBluSince1982
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,793
- Reaction score
- 1,340
Garrett has to go but that was the correct call.
I would think our coaching staff knows much more than myself about football. Can someone explain why in the hell we kicked for a FG to make the game a 4 point deficit? Most stupid call I have seen all year.
I would think our coaching staff knows much more than myself about football. Can someone explain why in the hell we kicked for a FG to make the game a 4 point deficit? Most stupid call I have seen all year.
I would think our coaching staff knows much more than myself about football. Can someone explain why in the hell we kicked for a FG to make the game a 4 point deficit? Most stupid call I have seen all year.
Probably because we thought we would get the ball back to score a TD. But I agree with Troy.
Because Garrett is soft
But why not tie the game in lieu of make it a 2 possession game?
Because Garrett is too conservative is the only answer I can come up with. As we have seen, he plays not to lose...not to win.I'm sure that's what they thought. The question is why? This was the deepest penetration they had all game and there were 6 minutes left on the clock.
The play selection was stupid, too.
First down: option run for 3 yards
Second down: pass into the end zone
Third down: pass into the end zone.
It wasn't 2nd and goal. It was 2nd and seven.
You wouldn't have preferred a tie or a chance to tie? I much rather know we need a FG than a TD
Well this as well if they ran the ball twice with Zeke and a FB I think it is at least 4th and short4th and 7 is not a good down and distance to convert.
If you wanna be pissed, question the 2nd and 3rd down play calls. They were much worse