Hostile;3259705 said:and the world won't end if he doesn't.
I'll be disappointed, but I won't go overboard.dbair1967;3259708 said:Dont know why thats such a hard concept for some to grasp here. There's numerous people that think this guy is the only player in the draft.
Hostile;3259711 said:I'll be disappointed, but I won't go overboard.
BrAinPaiNt;3259717 said:I might push you overboard. :
On a serious note. Really love the way this kid looks and it would be great if we got him. But as you two say...there are other players in the draft that can help this team. Also if he goes before us because he soars up the draft boards, than that means other players could fall to us.
The Realist;3259734 said:I like Ducasse in two so much better than Iupati in one.
OldSkool;3259749 said:That's what I'm thinking, also.
Golden Tate in Round one, Ducasse in two.
OldSkool;3259749 said:That's what I'm thinking, also.
Golden Tate in Round one, Ducasse in two.
bbgun;3259864 said:Would it be unethical to circulate a rumor that causes him to "slide" a little?
Romo 2 Austin;3259754 said:No WR in the first round, not even if Bryant falls to us.
dbair1967;3259731 said:What bothers me most about this is the reaction some stooges will still have, even if we had no chance to draft him.
"Jerry's an idiot!!!!"..."AHHHHHH, why didnt Jerry trade away half the draft to get him!!!!!"..."we are gonna rue the day!!!!"
Romo 2 Austin;3259754 said:No WR in the first round, not even if Bryant falls to us.
The Realist;3259734 said:I like Ducasse in two so much better than Iupati in one.
dbair1967;3259976 said:Geez...shut the hell up
Romo 2 Austin;3259754 said:No WR in the first round, not even if Bryant falls to us.