The most dangerous team in the NFC? Vikings

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Posted: December 7, 2007
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=315656

So who's the squad from the "other" conference that can create the most consternation in January and, if applicable, February? The Cowboys? Packers? Seahawks?


How about the Vikings?

Crazy as it sounds, the team that got "blowed out" (thanks, Emmitt) by the Packers in Week 10 is one of the hottest teams in all of football after a trio of wins against the Raiders, Giants, and Lions.

The first was a no-brainer, given the generally sorry state of the Oakland franchise. The 41-17 shocker in the Meadowlands was viewed by some as an aberration. But the demolition of Detroit raised eyebrows, especially in light of how Minnesota moved the ball with a previously one-dimensional offense.

The offense has been the biggest surprise over the past three games. Quarterback Tarvaris Jackson, a statistical bottom feeder earlier this season, has a passer rating of 69.6. He's almost back to the mythical "Kordoza Line" of 70.7, which is the career mark of former Steelers QB Kordell Stewart. More importantly, Jackson is 6-2 as the starter in his second NFL season.

Rookie phenom Adrian Peterson has been contributing significantly. He still leads the NFL in rushing with 1,197 yards despite missing two games with a torn knee ligament. The fact that the Vikings won both of those games proves that Peterson isn't indispensable, thanks to the presence of Chester Taylor.

The defense has been stuffing the run since converting to the cover 2 last season, and it's gradually improving against the pass.

So with the skills to move the ball on the ground and the ability to stop other teams from doing so, the Vikings are a team that can cause trouble when the climate turns cold. If, for example, the Vikes are required to return to the scene of their 34-0 thrashing at the hands of the Packers and it's windy and snowing, who would have the edge? The team that scores the bulk of its points through the air, or the team that can run and stop the run?

Or what if Minnesota goes back to Dallas? The Vikings played the Cowboys tough at Texas Stadium, leading the game in the third quarter until the Cowboys blocked a field goal and returned it for a touchdown.

Before the Vikings can get a shot at one of the best teams in the conference, they need to qualify for January play. The Vikings likely need to run the table in order to ensure a playoff berth. Minnesota is tied with the Cardinals and Lions at 6-6. One loss would make things interesting, but two would make the postseason a long shot.

The way they're playing, four more wins in the month of December aren't out of the question, especially since the Vikings play the 49ers, Bears, Commanders, and Broncos -- four teams on the wrong side of the .500 mark.

With nine teams jostling for two wild-card spots, it might be wise for Cowboys fans and Cheeseheads to hope that the team in purple ends up on the outside looking in when the time comes to extend the season. Given their composition and increasing confidence, the Vikings suddenly could be good enough to beat anyone in the NFC once winter begins.

And I can't believe I just typed that.
 
Lets just see if they can beat a team they are supposed to this week in San francisco.
 
theebs;1817375 said:
Lets just see if they can beat a team they are supposed to this week in San francisco.

I hope they don't due to the Pats owning their pick
 
Vikings, the most dangerous NFC team? Not hardly. Any team can be dangerous.
 
Gryphon;1817373 said:
Crazy as it sounds, the team that got "blowed out" (thanks, Emmitt) by the Packers in Week 10 is one of the hottest teams in all of football after a trio of wins against the Raiders, Giants, and Lions.

The first was a no-brainer, given the generally sorry state of the Oakland franchise. The 41-17 shocker in the Meadowlands was viewed by some as an aberration. But the demolition of Detroit raised eyebrows, especially in light of how Minnesota moved the ball with a previously one-dimensional offense.
Game one they beat Oakland. Big deal.

Game two Eli was just horrible as the D outscored the O.

Game three they beat a bad Detroit team.

Sorry, I'm not buying those three victories as making the Viqueens a "dangerous" team by any means.
 
big dog cowboy;1817429 said:
Game one they beat Oakland. Big deal.

Game two Eli was just horrible as the D outscored the O.

Game three they beat a bad Detroit team.

Sorry, I'm not buying those three victories as making the Viqueens a "dangerous" team by any means.

Agreed. We beat Minny on a bad day. They may have improved, but so have we. The only dangerous team in the NFC is Dallas. Props to Green Bay, but they have played NOBODY but us and you know what happened there. If the Cowboys keep bringing their A game, especially on the road, none of their opponents have a chance.
 
big dog cowboy;1817429 said:
Game one they beat Oakland. Big deal.

Game two Eli was just horrible as the D outscored the O.

Game three they beat a bad Detroit team.

Sorry, I'm not buying those three victories as making the Viqueens a "dangerous" team by any means.

Yea, sorry if I am not impressed with the Vikes.

Where is all this love coming from? Since when did beating Oakland, Detroit, and a barely competitive G-men team become something special?

I am really scared of Minny getting in the playoffs......please:laugh2:
 
Why do we all keep forgetting that Romo injuried his hammy in the 2nd quarter of the game against the Vikes and, while he remained in the game, was clearly unable to move about much & he only completed 3 out of 7 passes in the second half. Before his injury, he was something like 28 out of 32 earlier in the first half.
 
Gryphon;1817373 said:
The Vikings played the Cowboys tough at Texas Stadium, leading the game in the third quarter until the Cowboys blocked a field goal and returned it for a touchdown.

That's not true. The game was tied when we blocked the field goal.

And the only reason the game was close until that point was that we lost two fumbles and missed a field goal in the first half. In the entire rest of the season, we've lost a grand total of two fumbles and missed one (unblocked) field-goal attempt. Good luck getting three of those things to happen again next time, Vikings.
 
That game had a slow start by the offense. The defense and ST didnt start slow and they kept the Viks in check untill the offense got some traction. AP had a good but not great game so the run game doesnt scare me and Mr. 97 yards passing Jackson doesnt either.
 
well, the Vikes arnt going to make the playoffs and even if they do, they'll probably get blown out by Seattle or Tampa Bay

they certainly are no threat to us

David
 
dbair1967;1817531 said:
well, the Vikes arnt going to make the playoffs and even if they do, they'll probably get blown out by Seattle or Tampa Bay

they certainly are no threat to us

David
And then we can say they are who we thought they were. :D
 
The first time played Green Bay played Minny this season, they barely escaped with a 7 point win. Adrian Peterson had 112 yards rushing the first half. Minnesota did not run Peterson once in the second half. That baffled me.

The second time was a Packer 34-0 win, but that was minus Peterson, who left in the 3rd qtr. with an injury, and Brooks Bollinger as the starting QB.

Packers keyed on stopping Peterson, because they knew Bollinger was not going hurt them.

I would love to see a Viking/Packer rematch with all starters healthy in the line-up simply because the Packer fans claim this is why Dallas beat GB.

So basically we could say that is why Green Bay beat the Vikings.......their two key offensive players were out.
 
If the Vikings can get some consistant play out of the QB position, they might make some noise b4 the year is out.
 
Their QB is Tavaris jackson.

so no, they don't scare me
 
I venture to guess i watch as many Queens games as any Cowboys fan and they are no better than an average team. You lose to them in the PO's and you don't deserve to advance.
 
Vikings have no defensive rush, their Qb is horrible, the oline is not any good, WRs are terrible, (I think Sydney Rice will become good tho) and Darren Sharper is still a DB that talks a big game but rarely has one. And to top that off they have Mr Noodle from Elmos World calling all the plays.

It's good for Packer fans that the Vikings have won three in a row. Mr Noodle has already been given the vote of confidence and will come back next year.

Packers would have no problem facing the Vikings again in the playoffs. Shut down their running game and the game is over.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,354
Messages
14,532,261
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top