The most important thing about Monte Kiffin

Awakened

the Dude abides
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
1,228
He turned arguably the best defensive player in the NFL into an average player.

He turned a tremendous LBer with out-of-this-world potential (Carter) into a bumbling, stumbling part-time starter.

IF I KNEW NOTHING ELSE ABOUT KIFFIN AND THE SWITCH TO THE 4-3, THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH.

Huge setback for this organization.
 

Tabascocat

Dexternjack
Messages
27,783
Reaction score
38,826
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
popcorn2.gif
 

panchucko

It's Back
Messages
4,341
Reaction score
2,803
I don't think carter was all that, he seems to have potential but I don't think anyone has ruined him

Only cowboys LB ever ruined was bobby carpenter, having to play a new position every year just killed him ;)
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
He turned arguably the best defensive player in the NFL into an average player.

He turned a tremendous LBer with out-of-this-world potential (Carter) into a bumbling, stumbling part-time starter.

IF I KNEW NOTHING ELSE ABOUT KIFFIN AND THE SWITCH TO THE 4-3, THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH.

Huge setback for this organization.

Carter was a little slow learning the last defense, and might just be a little slow learning this one as well. Give it a little time. He should get back to playing purely on his instincts when he feels comfortable with the scheme.
 

JBond

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,028
Reaction score
3,491
The most important thing to understand is that he is overwhelmed. In person I watched one of the best defenses, of all time statistically, crumble with a couple of injuries. KC vs SD.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
I don't think carter was all that, he seems to have potential but I don't think anyone has ruined him

Only cowboys LB ever ruined was bobby carpenter, having to play a new position every year just killed him ;)
Carpenter just played soft Dallas didn't make him that.
 

Matts4313

Well-Known Member
Messages
346
Reaction score
267
the fact that you even think Ware was in the conversation of best def player in the league tells me enough about you. Kidding.

Ware has been injured and below his HOF caliber for a couple years now.
 

Illini88228

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,240
Reaction score
191
the fact that you even think Ware was in the conversation of best def player in the league tells me enough about you. Kidding.

Ware has been injured and below his HOF caliber for a couple years now.

He's not talking about Ware. He thinks Bruce Carter was the best defensive player in football.
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
11,978
I dont know about all that but the 4-3 was a huge mistake!!!! Just so everybody knows though that fly/run to the ball is from Marinelli not Kiffen!!!
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
I dont know about all that but the 4-3 was a huge mistake!!!! Just so everybody knows though that fly/run to the ball is from Marinelli not Kiffen!!!

I don't mind the transition to the 4-3, but I think not acquiring the right personnel was a mistake. We kept all the same players and expected them to all play fine in a 4-3. What did we do the year we switched to a 3-4? Got two 1st rounders and drafted Ware and Spears. But, in the long run, I think the switch to a 4-3 was the right move. The players who made our 3-4 are not the same or are long gone. Ratliff is gone, Ware is a shell of his former self, Canty has been gone, Spencer is on the final year of his contract. I think it's easier to find efficient pass rushers in a 4-3 than it is to find elite edge rushers like Ware for the 3-4. I also think Marinelli is a good guy to make something work on the D-line. However, we should have drafted and signed D-line players. It makes no sense that we didn't. We got lucky finding Selvie on the scrap heap and we got lucky that Hatcher ended up better in the 4-3 than the 3-4. However, Selvie is good but not elite, and Hatcher is old and on the last year of his contract. We have absolutely no future prospects on this D-line. We need a complete overhaul and we set ourselves back a year by not attempting to address is this past draft.
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
11,978
I don't mind the transition to the 4-3, but I think not acquiring the right personnel was a mistake. We kept all the same players and expected them to all play fine in a 4-3. What did we do the year we switched to a 3-4? Got two 1st rounders and drafted Ware and Spears. But, in the long run, I think the switch to a 4-3 was the right move. The players who made our 3-4 are not the same or are long gone. Ratliff is gone, Ware is a shell of his former self, Canty has been gone, Spencer is on the final year of his contract. I think it's easier to find efficient pass rushers in a 4-3 than it is to find elite edge rushers like Ware for the 3-4. I also think Marinelli is a good guy to make something work on the D-line. However, we should have drafted and signed D-line players. It makes no sense that we didn't. We got lucky finding Selvie on the scrap heap and we got lucky that Hatcher ended up better in the 4-3 than the 3-4. However, Selvie is good but not elite, and Hatcher is old and on the last year of his contract. We have absolutely no future prospects on this D-line. We need a complete overhaul and we set ourselves back a year by not attempting to address is this past draft.

Totally agree we built for the 3-4 and tried running the 4-3
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
I don't mind the transition to the 4-3, but I think not acquiring the right personnel was a mistake. We kept all the same players and expected them to all play fine in a 4-3. What did we do the year we switched to a 3-4? Got two 1st rounders and drafted Ware and Spears. But, in the long run, I think the switch to a 4-3 was the right move..

I don't disagree, but I think you switch schemes when you are rebuilding, like when Parcells came on board. You don't do a philosophical overhaul when your core pieces are in their 30's and you need to win now.

And even if you do, then you concentrate your draft on making the switch. Even if the projected at the time front 4 DL were arguably good enough for the switch, there was no depth. A 4-3 these days requires a solid rotation of players up front, not 4 good guys and a bunch of scrubs. Even making this switch, we didn't spend a single draft pick on the DL and took a project TE in the 2nd.

It was typically reactionary, spur of the moment Jerry, and we are reaping what he has sowed. Again.
 

dupree89

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,508
Reaction score
2,748
Totally agree we built for the 3-4 and tried running the 4-3


I dont have great enough knowledge to say which is better or which we are most suited for....but I just hope we stick with the 4-3 now and hire and draft accordingly.
 

Hoov

Senior Member
Messages
6,033
Reaction score
1,191
really.,,,,,just tell us how you really feel........WOW. Guess you didn't see that tremendous Lber just stand there and watch the Giants TE fall down and get up and go in for a score.....untouched....Oh wait blame the coach for that one.....its not Carter's fault he just stood there and watched on national tv..... he is a tremendous Lber after all.........what homer post.

the MODs need to really add a STUPID button right next to the Like button, and Reply Buttons
:)
 
Top