AMERICAS_FAN
Active Member
- Messages
- 7,198
- Reaction score
- 0
The problem is not a lack of leadership-ability, it’s a lack of accountability; and there is a HUE difference!
I understand that the Cowboys could use more accountability on the part of coaches and players, but I do NOT buy into “the Cowboys lack leadership” argument, because the implication underlying it is that there are no leaders on this team.
That's BS. This team has plenty of leaders; what it needs is the best of them to lead better - up to the best of their abilities. For example, it’s not about Romo becoming a leader; he already is, but he needs to step up and lead better. The same goes with other players like TO, Witten, Ware, etc., and even the top coaches. The leadership skill and ability IS there, it just needs to be further cultivated, and not allowed to be underachieved. That’s why what this team needs precisely is more accountability and that only. The leadership is already there and it can help tease "improved accountability" out.
I also find if funny how all of these media people, and supposed football people, including former players, are all coming out of the woodwork now to say how this team can't win because they have no leaders among the coach and player rosters. Really, then why were the same people singing the team’s praises in the offseason about how they would win the Super Bowl? If they truly are “experts” shouldn’t they have known better, and instead of singing praises say “I know they’re being favored, but I’m not convinced because leadership is lacking on the team”?
So which is it – did these experts not say things like this because they were mistaken about the leadership that exists -- which then directly questions their expertise – or did they see the lack of leadership but brushed it aside – which would make them quite hypocritical to now say how leadership is so important when before it was not mentioned as an “ingredient” necessary for the Cowboys’ forecasted winning.
I just find it funny how these peoples’ hindsight is so 20-20 now on the issue of leadership, but their foresight is as blind as bat. Well, today’s hindsight is tomorrow’s foresight, so if all these so called experts and insiders now believe that this team lacks leaders, then I think we can all rest assured that they’re missing the mark about that, once again.
So that gives me hope for 2009 because I do see the leadership ability on this team, and with the right dose of accountability – where leaders stand up and lead to their abilities – then I think these 2009 Cowboys will be just fine. It’s not a question if IF they have it in them, but WILL they bring it out. And so our top-dog players and coaches need to step up in that regard. Which is why I believe that the only basis Jerry Jones should be using in deciding if these key players/coaches should be kept or released is one that examines if these leaders are becoming committed to leading to their abilities or not. If they are then Jerry Jones should invite them back; and only otherwise should he let then go.
It really is this simple! JMHO
I understand that the Cowboys could use more accountability on the part of coaches and players, but I do NOT buy into “the Cowboys lack leadership” argument, because the implication underlying it is that there are no leaders on this team.
That's BS. This team has plenty of leaders; what it needs is the best of them to lead better - up to the best of their abilities. For example, it’s not about Romo becoming a leader; he already is, but he needs to step up and lead better. The same goes with other players like TO, Witten, Ware, etc., and even the top coaches. The leadership skill and ability IS there, it just needs to be further cultivated, and not allowed to be underachieved. That’s why what this team needs precisely is more accountability and that only. The leadership is already there and it can help tease "improved accountability" out.
I also find if funny how all of these media people, and supposed football people, including former players, are all coming out of the woodwork now to say how this team can't win because they have no leaders among the coach and player rosters. Really, then why were the same people singing the team’s praises in the offseason about how they would win the Super Bowl? If they truly are “experts” shouldn’t they have known better, and instead of singing praises say “I know they’re being favored, but I’m not convinced because leadership is lacking on the team”?
So which is it – did these experts not say things like this because they were mistaken about the leadership that exists -- which then directly questions their expertise – or did they see the lack of leadership but brushed it aside – which would make them quite hypocritical to now say how leadership is so important when before it was not mentioned as an “ingredient” necessary for the Cowboys’ forecasted winning.
I just find it funny how these peoples’ hindsight is so 20-20 now on the issue of leadership, but their foresight is as blind as bat. Well, today’s hindsight is tomorrow’s foresight, so if all these so called experts and insiders now believe that this team lacks leaders, then I think we can all rest assured that they’re missing the mark about that, once again.
So that gives me hope for 2009 because I do see the leadership ability on this team, and with the right dose of accountability – where leaders stand up and lead to their abilities – then I think these 2009 Cowboys will be just fine. It’s not a question if IF they have it in them, but WILL they bring it out. And so our top-dog players and coaches need to step up in that regard. Which is why I believe that the only basis Jerry Jones should be using in deciding if these key players/coaches should be kept or released is one that examines if these leaders are becoming committed to leading to their abilities or not. If they are then Jerry Jones should invite them back; and only otherwise should he let then go.
It really is this simple! JMHO