CCBoy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,032
- Reaction score
- 22,626
The Pros & Cons Of Anthony Hitchens Replacing Rolando McClain In The Cowboys Defense
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2016...rolando-mcclain-in-the-dallas-cowboys-defense
With Rolando McClain facing a 10-game suspension the Dallas Cowboys are in a bind. They have invested in moving Sean Lee to the WILL linebacker spot and it seems to have paid off with him being both amazingly productive and having one of his healthiest seasons yet. The last thing Dallas wants to do is move him back to MIKE. But, apart from Lee, they don’t have anyone who has proven they can play the position the way Dallas needs it played.
Now, some of you may fondly remember Anthony Hitchens from 2014. I was impressed enough with him that I argued against bringing McClain back for 2015, as, according to Pro Football Focus Hitchens actually had a better stop rate than McClain. But for 2015, PFF raked Hitchens over the coals, rating him in the bottom quarter of the league against the run. In similar vein, BTBers Joey Ickes and Landon McCool in a recent pod cast argued that Hitchens would merely be run over for lack of sand in his shorts. Did the Atlanta Falcons and Devonte Freeman simply find Hitchens’ weakness and render him useless for the MIKE linebacker spot?
Well, not entirely. A MIKE linebacker has a lot of responsibilities in Rod Marinelli’s defense and the ability to stack and shed is only one of them. Hitchens is still a strong performer in most of those categories, particularly navigating a wash of blockers as you’ll see below. But there is a real weakness when he is asked to take on an offensive lineman or a top notch fullback (Atlanta’s Patrick DiMarco was the highest rated blocking fullback by 12% points over the next ranked contender in PFF’s rankings). I did an in depth examination of Hitchens’ performance during McClain’s four-game suspension last year as well as the Jets game, where Hitchens again filled in at the MIKE spot.
Hitchens did not have any real trouble against the Giants or the Eagles (neither of whom had a fearsome rushing attack last year) as exemplified by the plays here...
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2016...rolando-mcclain-in-the-dallas-cowboys-defense
With Rolando McClain facing a 10-game suspension the Dallas Cowboys are in a bind. They have invested in moving Sean Lee to the WILL linebacker spot and it seems to have paid off with him being both amazingly productive and having one of his healthiest seasons yet. The last thing Dallas wants to do is move him back to MIKE. But, apart from Lee, they don’t have anyone who has proven they can play the position the way Dallas needs it played.
Now, some of you may fondly remember Anthony Hitchens from 2014. I was impressed enough with him that I argued against bringing McClain back for 2015, as, according to Pro Football Focus Hitchens actually had a better stop rate than McClain. But for 2015, PFF raked Hitchens over the coals, rating him in the bottom quarter of the league against the run. In similar vein, BTBers Joey Ickes and Landon McCool in a recent pod cast argued that Hitchens would merely be run over for lack of sand in his shorts. Did the Atlanta Falcons and Devonte Freeman simply find Hitchens’ weakness and render him useless for the MIKE linebacker spot?
Well, not entirely. A MIKE linebacker has a lot of responsibilities in Rod Marinelli’s defense and the ability to stack and shed is only one of them. Hitchens is still a strong performer in most of those categories, particularly navigating a wash of blockers as you’ll see below. But there is a real weakness when he is asked to take on an offensive lineman or a top notch fullback (Atlanta’s Patrick DiMarco was the highest rated blocking fullback by 12% points over the next ranked contender in PFF’s rankings). I did an in depth examination of Hitchens’ performance during McClain’s four-game suspension last year as well as the Jets game, where Hitchens again filled in at the MIKE spot.
Hitchens did not have any real trouble against the Giants or the Eagles (neither of whom had a fearsome rushing attack last year) as exemplified by the plays here...