blindzebra
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,560
- Reaction score
- 4,451
Or think we do anyway.
The little FB nugget in today's PC got me thinking...yeah, dangerous, I know.
The minimum we will likely keep at each position.
QB: 3, this one is pretty set in stone.
RB: 3, Parcells spoke at length about his desired breakdown of play distribution today.
FB: 0
TE: 2, Campbell and Witten then ?, but 3 is probably more likely, not including Robinson.
WR: 4, is pushing it when special teams needs are included.
OL: 8, five starters and one back up for each position.
Offensive minimum: 20
DL: 6, probably light.
LB: 7, same as OL starters and one back up each.
CB: 5, can't go below 5 in todays game.
S: 3, Parcells has said every guy we have is a SS, so why'd we need two back ups.
Defensive minimum: 21
K: 1
P: 1
LS: 1
Specialists: 3
We have 9 spots to play with, IMO.
I say we keep at least one more player at OL, TE, WR, DL, LB, CB, and S. Bringing those totals to 9 OL, 3 TE, 5 WR, 7 DL, 8 LB, 6 CB, 4 S, respectively.
Two more spots, have fun.
The little FB nugget in today's PC got me thinking...yeah, dangerous, I know.
The minimum we will likely keep at each position.
QB: 3, this one is pretty set in stone.
RB: 3, Parcells spoke at length about his desired breakdown of play distribution today.
FB: 0
TE: 2, Campbell and Witten then ?, but 3 is probably more likely, not including Robinson.
WR: 4, is pushing it when special teams needs are included.
OL: 8, five starters and one back up for each position.
Offensive minimum: 20
DL: 6, probably light.
LB: 7, same as OL starters and one back up each.
CB: 5, can't go below 5 in todays game.
S: 3, Parcells has said every guy we have is a SS, so why'd we need two back ups.
Defensive minimum: 21
K: 1
P: 1
LS: 1
Specialists: 3
We have 9 spots to play with, IMO.
I say we keep at least one more player at OL, TE, WR, DL, LB, CB, and S. Bringing those totals to 9 OL, 3 TE, 5 WR, 7 DL, 8 LB, 6 CB, 4 S, respectively.
Two more spots, have fun.