The TE position, OJ Howard. other options

[CowboysExchange]

Lol - you said he wouldn’t be an option at all except in jump balls in the end zone, and otherwise would sit on the bench. What you are saying now is an admission you lied about what the story said.

And you’ve done that so many times you can’t keep it straight.

As for the 3rd WR starting instead of the TE, are you really still ridiculously claiming a 3rd WR takes the TE off the field? Lol. You’re value is only in how comical you are.

A third everydown wr will take the 2nd te off the field. That is a great thing cuz we dont even have a good #1 te lmao. Been saying that for 6+ years. So we kill the 12 formation and start an 11 personnel and sub by adding a little dash of pollard or austin if he comes back. Sure Jarwin has an opportunity to flourish just like Hanna, escobar and swaim did. But they didnt and neither did #82 for the last 6+ years

 

[PJTHEDOORS]

A third everydown wr will take the 2nd te off the field. That is a great thing cuz we dont even have a good #1 te lmao. Been saying that for 6+ years. So we kill the 12 formation and start an 11 personnel and sub by adding a little dash of pollard or austin if he comes back. Sure Jarwin has an opportunity to flourish just like Hanna, escobar and swaim did. But they didnt and neither did #82 for the last 6+ years

Jarwin can move the chains. I have faith.

 

[OmerV]

A third everydown wr will take the 2nd te off the field. That is a great thing cuz we dont even have a good #1 te lmao. Been saying that for 6+ years. So we kill the 12 formation and start an 11 personnel and sub by adding a little dash of pollard or austin if he comes back. Sure Jarwin has an opportunity to flourish just like Hanna, escobar and swaim did. But they didnt and neither did #82 for the last 6+ years

Lol - still flip flopping ...

According to you the article was significant when you claimed it said Jarwin would sit on the bench, but once I exposed yet another of your blatantly false claims and showed the article actually says Jarwin will thrive, suddenly you think the article‘s comments about Jarwin arent so important.

This was YOUR article, and now you are hiding from it. Do you not realize how ridiculous your never ending blatently false statements and flip flops to cover them up make you look?

Jarwin was given a nice contract to be the lead dog TE, and this is not the same offense or coach, therefore this is not the same situation as Hanna, Escobar and Swaim.

You have no apples to apples comparison to go by, so you pretend apples to tuna fish works. But you are a world class sprinter when running away from both logic and your own words, so keep runninhg baby!

 

[CowboysExchange]

Lol - still flip flopping ...

According to you the article was significant when you claimed it said Jarwin would sit on the bench, but once I exposed yet another of your blatantly false claims and showed the article actually says Jarwin will thrive, suddenly you think the article‘s comments about Jarwin arent so important.

This was YOUR article, and now you are hiding from it. Do you not realize how ridiculous your never ending blatently false statements and flip flops to cover them up make you look?

Jarwin was given a nice contract to be the lead dog TE, and this is not the same offense or coach, therefore this is not the same situation as Hanna, Escobar and Swaim.

You have no apples to apples comparison to go by, so you pretend apples to tuna fish works. But you are a world class sprinter when running away from both logic and your own words, so keep runninhg baby!

For 10 years we've run this dual te system with a #1 te that never comes off the field and A 2nd te that never produces. The whole te core has done very little winning with their 4-5 TD a year averages therefore they have no business being that involved much less hardwired into our offense on every passing snap.

So there will be very few 12 formations and the starting te won't have that everydown position either. If that's not a major difference then I don't know what is.

Alot of fans wanted to see Beasely as an everydown 3rd wr but the scheme is not slot wr friendly because of these tes roles. Now the 3rd wr will be the starter not the sorry 2nd te.

Having our best skilled players on the field is essential. For 10 years we treated our starting te as a top passing weapon based upon usage and snaps. Unfortunately the things that made him great were not a winning formula. They couldn't score or make game changing plays therefore defenses forced us to beat them w these checksdown tes and these tes never delivered. The only time they produced is when it didn't matter. They folded like a cheap suit in elimination and playoff games and our season ended. But you paint a rosy picture of their accomplishments. All which don't include winning on paper just in theory. Well theory is all good when you have the talent but when ya don't have the talent ya gotta play the best player for that down and distance. None of our tes in 6 plus years have been a top skilled player but they took those snaps away from better talent

 

[CowboysExchange]

Oh and I wish Jarwin the best. I would love to see him and schultz morph into a Gronk and Hernandez.

But even Bill Belechek quit using that stupid 12 formation dominantly when that Superstar tandem broke up. He could play a bunch of scrubs and that same 12 scheme and hope they get better and win every year like the Cowboys next man up system but he believes in winning not selling groceries lmao