ok I know the defense was bad at times last season, so not giving them a pass.
Now do you agree, that the defense has little to do with how many points cowboys score?
32 points a game is deceptive, you have to look deeper than that or overall stats.
game 1
This was cowboys best game, and I think MM blew it when he didnt kick a short fg to tie the game at 20-20
But lets look at it by qrt's and halves. 0.14.3.0
2 qrt's with 0 points , that is bad and 1 with only 3 points. same for 2nd half, only 3 points, and it is hard to win games
when off can only score 3 points in 2nd half !
That isnt a #1 off or even a good offense. Now they were playing a good ram defense, but still that is not good.
game 2 0.10.14.16
here again they had 0 point in a qrt. they were down 29-10 at the half, not a good off showing imo.
Falcons let up thinking they had the game, and dallas scores 14 and 16, and the awful lol defense held the falcons to 0 points and then 10
in the 4th to help dallas in the comeback win, not to mention the screw up on the onside kick.
both the off and def rallied in 2nd half to help win this game, but as usual the off gets all the credit.
game 3 Seahawks 9.6.7.9
Cowboys managed to not have any 0 point qrt's thats good, but not one qrt with 10 or more points.
This game turned into a shoot out and the cowboys offense fell short.
Seattle 9.14.7.8 they had 1 qrt with 10 or more points and that was the difference. 38-31
Dallas was again down at the half 23-15
Wilson was hot at that point, so our defense didnt really do all that bad, and the seattle def was really bad at that point.
game 4 cleveland 7.24.10.8 dallas 14.0.0.24
again dallas has 2 0 point qrts , that is bad and puts defense in bad spots usually, as you can see while dallas was not scoring ANY points,
Cleveland scored 34 ! not a coincidence. Dallas was down 41-14 going in 4th so they let up and dak did good scoring the 24 garbage time points.
and had a chance to score a td for tie or lead but threw the int.
So even though dallas scored 38 points, it was too late in the game and partly due to cleveland playing prevent.
The bottom line is the offense was not very good in 1st 4 games, and I dont put all the blame on dak as some do, but thats where the
play calling, and game plans , game mgmt all come into play, and they were not good in any of those.
Really aside from a few early drives for td's they were only good when playing against a team that had a big lead..
They had 5 0 point qrt's in those 1st 4 games , and that is not a good offense.