The worthless waiver wire

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,706
Reaction score
30,408
I preferred the older system of cuts where it was continuous vs. this one fell swoop thing. We cut guys I didn't even know were on the team as they couldn't even get time when the scrubbiest of the scrubs were scrubbing.
Yeah some of the names I was seeing I didn’t recognize. Didn’t know if I was looking at our cuts or another teams.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,706
Reaction score
30,408
I prefer that too.

Take for example the two players Dallas picked up yesterday, Redmond and Campbell.

In previous years, these two might have gone in the first wave of cuts. Instead of getting a week to try them out in the preseason finale, they tote them into the opener.
Yeah they get 1 week to learn our system before games start.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
6,851
I'll bet out scouting dept. has notes on each player of each teams practice squad. If I remember right we got Irving from the Chiefs practice squad.
 

links18

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,395
Reaction score
20,223
I am not.

Despite the numerous people around here who claimed he was good enough several years ago, the player was soft and could not play.

In a league where competent OL are scarce to begin with, him still being unsigned speaks volumes.

This is the same guy they sent out there to protect Dak's blindside with no help just last season?
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,695
Reaction score
30,374
Getting Tapper back surprised me. He has talent and he's young. He certainly is better than a lot of bottom of the roster DEs in the league.
I'd be shocked if his rep around the league was anything but brittle.
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,029
Some of the guys Dallas waived, who no one claimed, were being discussed as trade bait here the past few weeks.

The status/value of most players is open to speculation, and the success level varies, depending on health, location, scheme, officiating, the talent he plays with and against, etc.
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
A sign that teams are getting better at cap management too.
Also with rookie pay scale teams do not have to stay married to bad draft picks as long. 10 years ago denver would have to either hold lunch on the roster or take a big hit on their cap.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,445
Reaction score
29,305
NFL teams just released about 1,200 players on cut day.

As of yesterday afternoon, only 38 had been claimed.

Barely more than 1 per team. No Dallas players have been scooped up yet.

Teams aren't interested in other teams interchangeable garbage. Some players are probably kept just because other teams might be interested. Little fear of not getting your own guys to the practice squad that you want.
give it more time..labor day weekend with a weekend in an offseason prep for game 1, teams have to wait a bit..most will bring in Vets after game one because week two you dont have to guarantee money at all..

why does this matter at all? Baily has workout scheduled this week with Jets..ig trades and signings happening , Bell watch in effect etc etc..lots of stuff going on to worry about Jags without jobs..

like someone pointed out above not a lot of teams are throwing away good players, most were camp bodys and were destined for getting back their day jobs..more will get cut when stars come back off suspensions and injury..that bottom 10 of the 53 also not safe..the 43 core players are typically the ones that remain constant
 

JW82

JJ21
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
10,749
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Also with rookie pay scale teams do not have to stay married to bad draft picks as long. 10 years ago denver would have to either hold lunch on the roster or take a big hit on their cap.

True.
 

igtmfo

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,322
Reaction score
127
Scouting is so good and professional now that about all teams have the same grades. Not the Gil Brandt days anymore where you can find a gem hiding.

I think it was the Dallas Stars lead scout Joe McDonnell said nowadays his list 1-10 or 1-15 picks preparing for the draft - all go in that order in the actual draft. He's had his flubs lately (sad to say - Gurianov) but if you rewind that draft some team would have taken Gurianov right after us. The human element of scouting you can't figure but about all teams grade tape the same. More difficult NHL and NBA with grading overseas players that is the last frontier.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,039
Reaction score
8,854
Cut down from 90 to 53...that’s 37 players.
Of those 37, how many are realistically going to be NFL players and not just mere camp bodies? I’d say 15 would be generous.
Now factor in that players with more than 4 years of experience aren’t even subject to the waiver process.

So when you really wittle it down I’m not sure that 38 waiver claims number is truly the awful percentage OP is making it to be.

Really mostly what is out there waiver eligible is failed draft picks. And I think we were all already aware that a decent percentage of draft picks end up out of the league. A lot of them nothing to do with actual football talent.

That and this forum overrates cowboys players....Tapper is large and runs fast in a straight line. Other than that he’s never demonstrated any great nfl skills. Not that surprising he wasn’t picked up.
 

northerncowboynation

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,925
Reaction score
6,303
NFL teams just released about 1,200 players on cut day.

As of yesterday afternoon, only 38 had been claimed.

Barely more than 1 per team. No Dallas players have been scooped up yet.

Teams aren't interested in other teams interchangeable garbage. Some players are probably kept just because other teams might be interested. Little fear of not getting your own guys to the practice squad that you want.

IDK, the Browns struck pay dirt
 
Top