theogt
Surrealist
- Messages
- 45,846
- Reaction score
- 5,912
The Overall Rankings are based on two formulas: College Production and Physical Attributes. The College Production formula combines Tackles, TFL, and Sacks. I have limited my College Production analysis to the final 2 years of a player's college career. I've found that even the most productive athletes in college tend to only have 2 solid years of production. For various uncontrollable reasons such as injury, or simply having a better player in front of them, many players cannot get onto the field as DE early on in their college career.
Phystical Attributes combines each of the measurables taken at either the player's Combine or Pro Day: Height, Weight, 40-Time, 20-Time, 10-Time, Bench Press, Vertical Jump, Broad Jump, Shuttle Time, and Cone Time. If a player didn't run at the Combine, I substitute his Pro Day times. If a player didn't run a particular event at either his Pro Day or the Combine, I used an average of both the worst time in the group and the average of the group.
The formulas take each variable and provide a divisor such that the variance on each variable is roughly similar. This allows you to reach a number based on each variable that can translate across measurements into a single formula.
Now, this IS NOT a complete analysis of the players. I would certainly make a few changes if I were putting together a board of my own. However, the rankings are based on verifiable facts that should correlate very highly with a player's overall ranking. Again, it's not perfect, but it is a compilation of all objective measurements that we have available.
Overall Rankings - Based on Physical Attributes plus 2005 and 2006 College Production.
Adams, Gaines........90.21
Spencer, Anthony.....88.81
Robison, Brian.......87.79
Bazuin, Dan..........87.47
Crowder, Tim.........84.38
Ford, Jacob..........82.24
Woodley, LaMarr......82.14
Moore, Jay...........82.03
Ah You, CJ...........81.23
Abiamiri, Victor.....80.93
Moss, Jarvis.........80.22
Applewhite, Antwan...77.29
Atkins, Baraka.......74.27
Moses, Quentin.......73.03
2006 Rankings - Based on Physical Attributes plus only the players' 2006 College Production.
Spencer, Anthony.....86.94
Adams, Gaines........86.07
Robison, Brian.......84.23
Crowder, Tim.........82.63
Bazuin, Dan..........79.76
Moore, Jay...........79.51
Woodley, LaMarr......79.16
Ford, Jacob..........78.58
Ah You, CJ...........78.03
Abiamiri, Victor.....77.13
Moss, Jarvis.........76.74
Applewhite, Antwan...74.46
Atkins, Baraka.......73.22
Moses, Quentin.......68.15
Total Production Rankings - Based solely on College Production in 2005 and 2006.
Bazuin, Dan...........8.45
Spencer, Anthony......8.28
Adams, Gaines.........7.83
Ford, Jacob...........7.07
Crowder, Tim..........6.66
Abiamiri, Victor......6.35
Woodley, LaMarr.......6.28
Applewhite, Antwan....5.79
Moss, Jarvis..........5.77
Moore, Jay............5.05
Moses, Quentin........4.83
Robison, Brian........4.76
Atkins, Baraka........4.16
Ah You, CJ............3.95
2006 Production Rankings - Based on College Production in 2006.
Spencer, Anthony......7.72
Adams, Gaines.........6.58
Bazuin, Dan...........6.13
Crowder, Tim..........6.13
Ford, Jacob...........5.97
Woodley, LaMarr.......5.38
Abiamiri, Victor......5.21
Applewhite, Antwan....4.94
Moss, Jarvis..........4.72
Moore, Jay............4.30
Atkins, Baraka........3.85
Robison, Brian........3.69
Moses, Quentin........3.37
Ah You, CJ............2.99
Physical Attribute Rankings - Based on Combine and Pro Day Measurements.
Robison, Brian.......43.16
Ah You, CJ...........40.84
Moore, Jay...........39.11
Adams, Gaines........38.47
Crowder, Tim.........37.31
Woodley, LaMarr......36.73
Spencer, Anthony.....36.72
Moss, Jarvis.........36.60
Atkins, Baraka.......36.24
Abiamiri, Victor.....35.86
Bazuin, Dan..........35.59
Ford, Jacob..........35.21
Applewhite, Antwan...34.79
Moses, Quentin.......34.16
Here are some comparison stats:
DeMarcus Ware
Physical Attribute.....43.30 (1st)
2004 Production.........6.51 (3rd)
Total Production........7.41 (4th)
2004 Total Rating......93.86 (1st)
Overall Rating.........96.86 (1st)
Kamerion Wimbley
Physical Attributes....39.89 (3rd)
2005 Production.........4.64 (10th)
Total Production........5.63 (10th)
2005 Overall Rating....81.95 (5th)
Overall Rating.........85.24 (5th)
Here's what I find interesting. A guy like Mark Anderson seemingly came out of nowhere in 2006 to rack up 12 sacks as a rookie for Chicago. He was drafted in the 5th round, but based on these rankings he would clearly have been a top pick.
Mark Anderson
Physical Attributes....41.78 (2nd)
2005 Production.........4.78 (9th)
Total Production........6.22 (8th)
2005 Total Rating......85.59 (3rd)
Overall Rating.........90.38 (1st)
A similar situation happened with Marques Colston. My receiver formulas had him ranked 8th in this draft (a very deep draft in WRs) and 3rd in last year's draft. I just can't understand why Anderson could last until the 5th round and Colston could last until the 7th.
Manny Lawson
Physical Attributes....43.49 (1st)
2005 Production.........6.77 (2nd)
Total Production........8.05 (1st)
2005 Overal Rating.....95.05 (1st)
Overall Rating.........99.31 (1st)
This is why I was in love with this guy last season. Amazing measurables and amazing production in college. In 2006, San Francisco was forced to use him as a 4-3 OLB where he was unable to rush the passer much. He played pretty well, but should see more attempts to rush the passer in '07.
Phystical Attributes combines each of the measurables taken at either the player's Combine or Pro Day: Height, Weight, 40-Time, 20-Time, 10-Time, Bench Press, Vertical Jump, Broad Jump, Shuttle Time, and Cone Time. If a player didn't run at the Combine, I substitute his Pro Day times. If a player didn't run a particular event at either his Pro Day or the Combine, I used an average of both the worst time in the group and the average of the group.
The formulas take each variable and provide a divisor such that the variance on each variable is roughly similar. This allows you to reach a number based on each variable that can translate across measurements into a single formula.
Now, this IS NOT a complete analysis of the players. I would certainly make a few changes if I were putting together a board of my own. However, the rankings are based on verifiable facts that should correlate very highly with a player's overall ranking. Again, it's not perfect, but it is a compilation of all objective measurements that we have available.
Overall Rankings - Based on Physical Attributes plus 2005 and 2006 College Production.
Adams, Gaines........90.21
Spencer, Anthony.....88.81
Robison, Brian.......87.79
Bazuin, Dan..........87.47
Crowder, Tim.........84.38
Ford, Jacob..........82.24
Woodley, LaMarr......82.14
Moore, Jay...........82.03
Ah You, CJ...........81.23
Abiamiri, Victor.....80.93
Moss, Jarvis.........80.22
Applewhite, Antwan...77.29
Atkins, Baraka.......74.27
Moses, Quentin.......73.03
2006 Rankings - Based on Physical Attributes plus only the players' 2006 College Production.
Spencer, Anthony.....86.94
Adams, Gaines........86.07
Robison, Brian.......84.23
Crowder, Tim.........82.63
Bazuin, Dan..........79.76
Moore, Jay...........79.51
Woodley, LaMarr......79.16
Ford, Jacob..........78.58
Ah You, CJ...........78.03
Abiamiri, Victor.....77.13
Moss, Jarvis.........76.74
Applewhite, Antwan...74.46
Atkins, Baraka.......73.22
Moses, Quentin.......68.15
Total Production Rankings - Based solely on College Production in 2005 and 2006.
Bazuin, Dan...........8.45
Spencer, Anthony......8.28
Adams, Gaines.........7.83
Ford, Jacob...........7.07
Crowder, Tim..........6.66
Abiamiri, Victor......6.35
Woodley, LaMarr.......6.28
Applewhite, Antwan....5.79
Moss, Jarvis..........5.77
Moore, Jay............5.05
Moses, Quentin........4.83
Robison, Brian........4.76
Atkins, Baraka........4.16
Ah You, CJ............3.95
2006 Production Rankings - Based on College Production in 2006.
Spencer, Anthony......7.72
Adams, Gaines.........6.58
Bazuin, Dan...........6.13
Crowder, Tim..........6.13
Ford, Jacob...........5.97
Woodley, LaMarr.......5.38
Abiamiri, Victor......5.21
Applewhite, Antwan....4.94
Moss, Jarvis..........4.72
Moore, Jay............4.30
Atkins, Baraka........3.85
Robison, Brian........3.69
Moses, Quentin........3.37
Ah You, CJ............2.99
Physical Attribute Rankings - Based on Combine and Pro Day Measurements.
Robison, Brian.......43.16
Ah You, CJ...........40.84
Moore, Jay...........39.11
Adams, Gaines........38.47
Crowder, Tim.........37.31
Woodley, LaMarr......36.73
Spencer, Anthony.....36.72
Moss, Jarvis.........36.60
Atkins, Baraka.......36.24
Abiamiri, Victor.....35.86
Bazuin, Dan..........35.59
Ford, Jacob..........35.21
Applewhite, Antwan...34.79
Moses, Quentin.......34.16
Here are some comparison stats:
DeMarcus Ware
Physical Attribute.....43.30 (1st)
2004 Production.........6.51 (3rd)
Total Production........7.41 (4th)
2004 Total Rating......93.86 (1st)
Overall Rating.........96.86 (1st)
Kamerion Wimbley
Physical Attributes....39.89 (3rd)
2005 Production.........4.64 (10th)
Total Production........5.63 (10th)
2005 Overall Rating....81.95 (5th)
Overall Rating.........85.24 (5th)
Here's what I find interesting. A guy like Mark Anderson seemingly came out of nowhere in 2006 to rack up 12 sacks as a rookie for Chicago. He was drafted in the 5th round, but based on these rankings he would clearly have been a top pick.
Mark Anderson
Physical Attributes....41.78 (2nd)
2005 Production.........4.78 (9th)
Total Production........6.22 (8th)
2005 Total Rating......85.59 (3rd)
Overall Rating.........90.38 (1st)
A similar situation happened with Marques Colston. My receiver formulas had him ranked 8th in this draft (a very deep draft in WRs) and 3rd in last year's draft. I just can't understand why Anderson could last until the 5th round and Colston could last until the 7th.
Manny Lawson
Physical Attributes....43.49 (1st)
2005 Production.........6.77 (2nd)
Total Production........8.05 (1st)
2005 Overal Rating.....95.05 (1st)
Overall Rating.........99.31 (1st)
This is why I was in love with this guy last season. Amazing measurables and amazing production in college. In 2006, San Francisco was forced to use him as a 4-3 OLB where he was unable to rush the passer much. He played pretty well, but should see more attempts to rush the passer in '07.