Why does he need to be perfect. I’ve seen many a qb not be perfect why does Dak have to beNot his biggest fan but it was the best game he has played. Still was not perfect but kudos to him.
Exactly lol. First and goal at the 4 take a 6 yard loss on a pass play. Clock management always an issue here, cost us last week and a shot at the #1 seedThe best game he's ever seen him play included a pick six and a sack fumble. Not to mention atrocious clock management when trying to run the clock at the end.
The best game he's ever seen him play included a pick six and a sack fumble. Not to mention atrocious clock management when trying to run the clock at the end.
While Olsen isn't the greatest analyst in the booth, I thought he was right. Dak will give you a terrific offense and score a lot of points and will throw an INT or two. Olsen said "he throws into very tight windows and that's just who he is. He'll give you a lot of big plays and some bad throws." (Paraphrasing).Not his biggest fan but it was the best game he has played. Still was not perfect but kudos to him.
He’s wrong though. More than half his ints are terrible terribly thrown balls. Also defense with 4 turnovers and plenty of short fields to work with.While Olsen isn't the greatest analyst in the booth, I thought he was right. Dak will give you a terrific offense and score a lot of points and will throw an INT or two. Olsen said "he throws into very tight windows and that's just who he is. He'll give you a lot of big plays and some bad throws." (Paraphrasing).
I think, given any other QB that would be available in any theoretical "trade" or acquisition, Dak is still the best option. The biggest change I'd make is to ditch ALL those stupid trick plays. We have yet to run a single one.
And the other thing I'd do would be to get Steele back as quickly as possible---I know, not likely this year. But that guy is a monster run blocker.