That's okay, we're going 6-0 from here on out.Bob Sacamano;2423911 said:we have to beat Pitt, and Philly I believe to hold the tiebreaker
theogt;2423922 said:That's okay, we're going 6-0 from here on out.
HomeOfLegends;2423924 said:I believe the Falcons jumped us for the 6th playoff spot.
rojan;2423977 said:We have a better Div. Record than the Falcons.
Rack;2423927 said:With checking the link Theo left, I believe conference record is the next tie breaker (after head to head). In that case, we're still 3rd in the NFC East.
Rack;2423927 said:With checking the link Theo left, I believe conference record is the next tie breaker (after head to head). In that case, we're still 3rd in the NFC East.
I agree with this. The SF and Seattle games should be wins and then it comes down to that Pitt game. I watched Pitt today against SD and against Indy and the Giants. They have a very good defense but their offense is not very efficient. I see that game being very much like the Commander game tonight. Low scoring and close. Hopefully we come out on top. If we do then I think the playoffs are a shoo-in at 9-4 with 3 games left.jobberone;2423926 said:We're still behind them I think but essentially Atl, Dallas and the Skins are the top candidates for the WC. I think we go on a tear and go into the Giants game without a loss since the first game.
AdamJT13;2424016 said:Conference games are the fourth tiebreaker, behind head-to-head, division and common games.
Bob Sacamano;2423911 said:we have to beat Pitt, and Philly I believe to hold the tiebreaker
cowboyjoe;2424081 said:as i understand it, someone posted, that if we beat the Commanders by 3 points, and if we end up in a tie with them and comes to head to head, we win, because we beat them by 3 points, but im not sure about that
dont quote me on that;