Yeagermeister;2677486 said:They didn't tamper because The ATM doesn't negotiate. He just gives them whatever they ask for. :laugh2:
DS: How do you want Albert?
AH: 100 mil
DS: DONE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sign here
/sarcasm
Were they not convicted of that a few years ago under gibbs?Hostile;2677383 said:Titans seek tampering evidence against Commanders
The Tennesse Titans are interested in pursuing tampering charges against the Washington Commanders, who agreed to terms with defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth just five hours into the NFL free agency period. Jim Wyatt reports in the Nashville Tennessean that the big question is whether the Titans come up with enough evidence against the Commanders to make a good case to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.
One blogger forecast a $100 million deal and much was made of a meeting between Commanders owner Daniel Snyder and agent Chad Speck, who represents Haynesworth, at the NFL Combine in Indianapolis a week before free agency, which began Feb. 16 at 11 p.m. Central.
Asked if the Commanders tampered, Haynesworth said: "I don't think so. Yeah, Chad told me he met with the Commanders at the combine, but they were talking about Malcolm and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that.
"All I know is the Commanders called my agent at 11:04 Nashville time and they started negotiating then. They weren't anywhere close in the first couple of hours and then they got serious. Chad worked the deal then and it worked out.''
Reality;2677980 said:Honestly, I don't see the big deal. The Titans were not going to pay him and the Commanders stepped up (and IMO overpaid for him a little).
If the Commanders had undermined the Titans or "stole" him away then I could understand their irritation but the whole world knew they were not going to pay Haynesworth the money he wanted so why is this a big deal?
As long as the Commanders and Haynesworth's agent did not flaunt that they had a deal beforehand, it's non issue to me.
-Reality
Considering that Haynesworth was a candidate for DPOY I cannot imagine him taking a deal with the Titans without at least testing the free agent waters.mwj473;2678122 said:The only way I see this as a big deal is if the Titans were seriously negotiating with him and lets say they were offering him the same deal the Commanders were but only $90M & $35M garanteed.
The Titans are SUPPOSED to be the only team talking to big Al and maybe he was thinking of taking a deal like that UNTIL....
A little conversation with Danny Boy a week before FA begins and him saying we can better that deal.....$100M w/ $40M garanteed.
That is of course all hypothetical, but I could see how it could undermine what the Titans were doing as far as negotiations.
Of course after saying all that, nothing will happen.
Reality;2678138 said:Considering that Haynesworth was a candidate for DPOY I cannot imagine him taking a deal with the Titans without at least testing the free agent waters.
That being said, if the Titans really wanted him back, they could have franchised him instead of someone else. However, as I said, the whole sports world knew that Haynesworth would be available.
The Titans could have also signed him to an extension a year ago like the Cowboys are trying to do with Ware. Everything points to the Titans not wanting to pay Haynesworth what the market would pay him.
If some other team was really interested in Haynesworth, such as the Buccaneers, then I could see them having a valid complaint. However, I see no valid argument for the Titans since they had their chances.
-Reality
I agree, but I love the thought.EveryoneElse;2678047 said:Nothing will happen.
Hostile;2678613 said:I agree, but I love the thought.