bandfan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 806
- Reaction score
- 858
And David ****** Putney....Give us our first back plus a 2nd
And David ****** Putney....Give us our first back plus a 2nd
dakThat's good A first and a 2nd no player is worth that. Too much expense.
dakThat's good A first and a 2nd no player is worth that. Too much expense.
Lolol whoever wrote that piece is on drugs..a lot of them..I love Elliott..I'd deal him in a heartbeat for that package..even gruden isn't dumb enough to do that deal
Didn't the Raiders draft a running back in the first round?
Someone didn't read the article.
Actually, I did. My comment was a rhetorical question.Someone didn't read the article.
A raiders #1 pick would give you major leverage against the Dak negotiations. No need to over pay for Dak if that pick is a top 10 pick.
Karl Joseph I'd take plus a second
That's *****n' funny
So basically if somehow you can get Tua or trade the pick and somehow maneuver into getting Lawrence you'll stick with Dak?No thanxs. I'll take Dak over the unknown of the draft.
I would take my chances with a rookie QB on a rookie contract before I pay an average QB 30 mil. At least they could keep.this roster locked and loaded with talent.So basically if somehow you can get Tua or trade the pick and somehow maneuver into getting Lawrence you'll stick with Dak?
Exactly broI would take my chances with a rookie QB on a rookie contract before I pay an average QB 30 mil. At least they could keep.this roster locked and loaded with talent.