Posting reviews of regular people's opinions of the show proves what?
Having watched it now, i'd say it was a good PPV overall. Certainly, as the one review stated, TNA doesn't come close to WWE production value, but no company really comes close in that dept. So factoring out the big oohs and ahhs from the lighting and pyro asthetics, the matches were mostly good ones. The Lethal Lockdown match went very well, as did Angle/Jarrett, Joe vs. Pope, and Hernandez vs. Morgan.
The championship match, as i said, was pretty awful imo, with it ending sooner than it should have, and some lazy and unorganized wrestling during the match. I wasn't impressed by the in ring work there at all. However, overall for 35 bucks i'd say viewers got more value than the 55 they paid for WM to watch Vince give his "little buddy" Michael Cole entirely too much face time for the biggest PPV of the year.
Its amazing how some the gimmicks in WWE can center around giving an announcer a prime time match that took up a considerable amount of time, and having a Real World tool as your champion. If it wasn't for Taker/HHH the entire PPV would have been pretty lousy.