JoeCorrado;3454725 said:
"Problems" unless defined- is a relative term. Do I believe that he was some sort of a locker room "cancer" - the answer is no. Do I believe that he (and his attitude) created distractions? Sure. But distractions are the norm for any player in the NFL- players deal with "distractions" in stride, or they themselves become the next distraction.
Basically, you deny that he is a locker room problem.
Thanks.
JoeCorrado;3454725 said:
ESPN creates the story, the drama, the "distraction" to better peddle their own product. Terrell Owens SELLS- he sells commercial time for ESPN, and he sells TICKETS for NFL owners. Love him or hate him- the guy does draw attention, he does sell tickets. Did you think that Buffalo brought him to town as some missing piece to their SB aspirations, or to sell tickets?
The Bills gifted him with a one-year contract. Taking into consideration the personnel already in place, they had absolutely no Super Bowl aspirations--much less playoff hopes.
True, they brought Owens in to heighten fan enthusiasm. However, football rosters do not exist within vaccuums. The Bills front office evaluated their wide receiver corps.
They made the determination of whether Owens in the short-term would diminish, steady or improve their receiving options for one year. Even at his age (both last season and now), Owens' receiving skills would not be detrimental within any passing offense.
Would his skills elevate any passing offense significantly? That's debatable. In Buffalo's case, it didn't. Still, he complemented Lee Evans well enough to keep the Bills offense respectible and steady it for an entire season.
This allowed the Bills front office to maintain a good enough product for 2009 and extend their evaluation of the position for another year. Under the terms of their contract with Owens, it was an understandable gamble which paid off. That's a case of good short-term and intermediate football personnel management which Buffalo should be complimented.
JoeCorrado;3454725 said:
Owens was one of the most productive WR in the NFL during his tenure with the Cowboys. I have no complaints. Do you?
On the field? With the exception of his totally unnecessary penalty attracting antics, I haven't any complaints (except for an occasion where he could have gained a critical first down and decided not to, but I digress).
Off the field? Of course. Owens is, and always will be, a liability onto himself. If he had prevented himself from engaging in totally unnecessary self-glorifications (with an example being his completely avoidable one-on-one nationally televised interview with Deion Sanders), there is a high probability that he would have retired as a Dallas Cowboy in my opinion.
Still, Owens is Owens and that was never going to come to fruition. Simply put, he can't help himself. I recognized that trait within him within his first few seasons in San Francisco. It didn't surprise me then and it certainly didn't surprise me many years later when he played here.
That's always been the problem I have had with Owens. While media entities like ESPN tend to describe him as a cancer for teams, he has always inflicted himself with a terminal version. That's his choice and definitely not ESPN's fault.
Throughout its history, the NFL has seen (and will continue to see) various incarnations of the "Terrell Owens" within its player ranks--namely, extremely talented, yet woefully idiotic and self-defeating. The league has both endured and prospered in spite of these idiots and it will continue on without him. That's an essential life and career lesson which Owens will never embrace. For people like him, it is always (both literally and figuratively) someone else's fault for his own shortcomings. Poetic.
JoeCorrado;3454725 said:
Owens was a distraction at times- no doubt. And so are hundreds of other NFL players to some degree or another. How did the scales balance out for the team during his tenure here?
You are correct in stating: "And so are hundreds of other NFL players
to some degree or another". Some (and him included) will simply never grasp the sheer, innate essense of what that truly means.
As far as his tenure here is concerned, what of it? Did he contribute a bunch of receiving yards and touchdowns while he was here? Yep. Did he do just enough to help remove himself from this team's offensive equation in 2009?
Yep, but don't ask him, you or anyone else sympathetic to him. His woes are, "to some degree or another", [strike]ESPN[/strike] someone else's fault. Always has been. Always will.