TO... Did we get what we paid for??

YoMick;1150094 said:
Bringing in TO means that we deserve to have bad things happen? Is that wha you are saying?
I just want to be sure I understand.

I made the original statement and good or bad, we signed him and all that goes along with it. If he destroys the continuity, we deserve it. If he has one of the all time great seasons statistically for a WR, we deserve that too. This was an all or nothing play we signed up for. I didn't like it then and I don't like it now. Having said that, it's done. All we have now is but to wait and see how it plays out. Good, bad or ungly, we have opened ourselves up for all comers. We deserve everything he brings, good or bad so yes, the implication is definatly there for bad. However, it is also there for positive if that is what he should bring.
 
jackrussell;1150093 said:
And I'm glad none of the head in the sand bleeding heart apologists aren't running them.

What is exactly wrong with saying we're getting what we deserve?

Wouldn't the world be a better place if we all got what we deserved?

No.

I don't know about you but I'm getting way better than I deserve.
 
WV Cowboy;1150119 said:
No.

I don't know about you but I'm getting way better than I deserve.

Yeah...and so is TO. There's alot of people in this world getting more than they deserve, and while it makes it better for them, that doesn't equate to a better world.
 
Yes.

A loud mouth Jerk that puts up pretty decent numbers on the field.

Yes, we definately got what we paid for.

- Mike G.
 
ABQCOWBOY;1150106 said:
I made the original statement and good or bad, we signed him and all that goes along with it. If he destroys the continuity, we deserve it. If he has one of the all time great seasons statistically for a WR, we deserve that too. This was an all or nothing play we signed up for. I didn't like it then and I don't like it now. Having said that, it's done. All we have now is but to wait and see how it plays out. Good, bad or ungly, we have opened ourselves up for all comers. We deserve everything he brings, good or bad so yes, the implication is definatly there for bad. However, it is also there for positive if that is what he should bring.

To answer Yo, what you just said here. I couldn't add anything more, pretty much sums up how I feel about the whole thing.
 
TO is doing a good job for himself, but what about the team. A few days before The Commanders game TO tells the media that he falls asleep in meetings. He then does his stupid celebration in the endzone. Some how I believe TO was probably planning his stupid stunt in meetings. The Cowboys are getting what they paid for. Jerry Jones did not pay TO to change and I believe Jerry is probably the only person who might get TO's attention. He failed to do anything during the preseason and the rest of TO's antics. Maybe the next time TO stunt will hurt the team. He will be back next season, but nothing will change. I know TO is a great player, but it's unfortunate he can't put the team first.
 
CrazyCowboy;1150216 said:
T.O.,

is doing a good job!



I agree...but is GOOD...GOOD Enough???

With Romo under Center....no more excuses from TO...the dropped pass against the ratz was inexcusable for a SUPPOSED ELITE WR. Either stay awake during practice or get some freakin' STICKEM.

In any event...I am hopeful that Jerrah gets what he paid for...a PLAYMAKER!
 
minus a couple of crucial drops, I think we have, 6 TDs is pretty good, and he's opening up things for the running game

although he has still yet to make one of his patented 50-70 yard TD scampers, which I'm still anxiously waiting for
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,339
Messages
13,868,129
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top