Chocolate Lab;1876938 said:Combine will tell all with him. Not sure if his top-end speed is elite. (In fact, I'm pretty sure it's not.)
But he's a great ballhawk. If the ball is near him, he usually gets his hands on it somehow.
He did get beat deep on a few plays later, but to his credit he had the speed to close in on the receiver after getting beat initially and he made a play on the ball. Ultimately he got lucky that the WR dropped it, but without a doubt he had a role in forcing the incomplete.Chocolate Lab;1876938 said:Combine will tell all with him. Not sure if his top-end speed is elite. (In fact, I'm pretty sure it's not.)
But he's a great ballhawk. If the ball is near him, he usually gets his hands on it somehow.
theogt;1876949 said:He did get beat deep on a few plays later, but to his credit he had the speed to close in on the receiver after getting beat initially and he made a play on the ball. Ultimately he got lucky that the WR dropped it, but without a doubt he had a role in forcing the incomplete.
I still think he'll be the 4th corner taken.
Probably Malcolm Jenkins in the top 15, then Mike Jenkins/Cason both somewhere between 15-25, then Talib.Vintage;1877041 said:How do you think it will shake down, Corner wise?
theogt;1877050 said:Probably Malcolm Jenkins in the top 15, then Mike Jenkins/Cason both somewhere between 15-25, then Talib.
theogt;1876949 said:He did get beat deep on a few plays later, but to his credit he had the speed to close in on the receiver after getting beat initially and he made a play on the ball. Ultimately he got lucky that the WR dropped it, but without a doubt he had a role in forcing the incomplete.
I still think he'll be the 4th corner taken.
Actually, I was going to add to my post that the receiver wasn't really slowing to catch an underthrown pass. He might have slowed some, but he didn't stop. They were both in full stride. Maybe I'm wrong, but I watched it a couple times. I don't have in on DVR anymore, though.Bluefin;1877135 said:The receiver had to all but stop for the underthrown pass.
Not my definition of catch-up speed.
David276;1877139 said:i thought the talk of him last year was he has great speed and that was his whole deal
Bob Sacamano;1877144 said:I could be wrong, but I think the talk was about his big-play ability, he had 7 INTs last year
I don't use a DVR, either.theogt;1877141 said:Actually, I was going to add to my post that the receiver wasn't really slowing to catch an underthrown pass. He might have slowed some, but he didn't stop. They were both in full stride. Maybe I'm wrong, but I watched it a couple times. I don't have in on DVR anymore, though.
FuzzyLumpkins;1877186 said:Thats one thing I really dislike about the Holidays is that everyone starts basing a propects future on a single game or even play from a bowl game.
Bad teams like the Raiders *cough* Russell *cough* do things like that .