You can never have to may O-line guys but I dont know about first round. Really anywhere inside the thirdThis is Our Year;1997601 said:Why the hell would we be looking O-Line in the first? I don't even get why McShay would say that. We have a great O-Line plus we drafted two tackles last year.
This is Our Year;1997601 said:Why the hell would we be looking O-Line in the first? I don't even get why McShay would say that. We have a great O-Line plus we drafted two tackles last year.
dbair1967;1997582 said:people in these forums say that exact same thing every yr
David
jterrell;1997788 said:Because Flo isn't here forever and this is the deepest OT draft in history.
This is Our Year;1997685 said:I wonder if Stewart having surgery today might mean he will be there at pick #28 now. It's a 4-6 month rehab and even though it's not the end of the world you know it will scare some teams off. With a deep RB class we could luck out possibly and have Stewart at #28 you never know.
:starspin
That could very well happen. Many teams would be nervous drafting a 1st rounder who would be out several months going into training camp.....IF Stewart is there at #28, we have to take him!This is Our Year;1997685 said:I wonder if Stewart having surgery today might mean he will be there at pick #28 now. It's a 4-6 month rehab and even though it's not the end of the world you know it will scare some teams off. With a deep RB class we could luck out possibly and have Stewart at #28 you never know.
:starspin
Agree.This is Our Year;1997601 said:Why the hell would we be looking O-Line in the first? I don't even get why McShay would say that. We have a great O-Line plus we drafted two tackles last year.