In the 7 years that he and Drew Pearson we're on the team together Hill led the team in receptions 6 times, receiving yards 6 times, and TD's 5 times. Hill's rookie season he didn't play on offense regularly and had 2 receptions, that would be the only year he wasn't the team's receving leader until his last season (where he still was the leading WR in receptions, yards, and TDs).
So in essence when Pearson and Hill were starting across from each other, Hill led the team in receptions and receiving yards every season, and TD's in all but one. Their career numbers in every category are almost identical; Pearson had 10 more receptions, 166 less yards, and 3 less touchdowns than Hill (despite playiing 1 more season -- 11 to 10). Hill went on to lead the team in receing two more years, after Pearson retired, before finishing behind Hershel Walker his last year.
Why am I saying this? Not because I believe Hill was better than Pearson, but because he was not a clear WR2. No "clear" WR2 leads the team in receiving every year when across from a "clear" WR1. Yet Hill did. He and Pearson were 1a and 1b (interchangeably) before those labels even existed.
Tony Hill contributed to a superbowl win, another superbowl appearance, as well as 4 more conference championship appearances. The disrespect he gets is sometimes borderline sad to criminal.