You called why I couldn't watch anymore. You're a sellout dude, stop acting like you have integrity...and always got a little bit more dirt just when he looks he emptied his goody bag. I deftly hear your take my man. It was the lady agent that made me stay on longer than I would normally. It was a bit much.
The joke to do it is about as much energy as I have these daysYou are just a hankering to get Reality to fire me, aren't you?
Lol never brotha, really appr your touch on this place tbh (for real)
There is a lot of clean stuff that could be posted. The dirty stuff would simply be underrepresented due to lack of posted video examples. I do get your point though.
Best Playboy periodical?Oh for the love of all that is holy, no! No way! I will be moderating the idea thread, go to bed, wake up, log on, and have my eyes blasted by 50 skimpily clothed models from Beijing's Sports Illustrated editions! And I didn't even know Beijing HAD Sports Illustrated!!!
(I will wait-and-see if one of my favorite posters reads that without tagging him)
Another thing to consider is that moderator Grinch, DallasEast, would restrict any photos to cleavage up. And probably top edge of cleavage up at that. Please. No one hate me. After all, my heart is three sizes too small.
Now I have Rawhide's theme, which is one of my all-time favorites, bouncing off the insides of my skull. Thanks a lot!
If you ever book a flight on a private jet and notice James Spader is on the passenger list, skip it. Trust me or you might receive a first-hand lesson in Isaac Newton's Law of Gravity.
Me likey that one.
Wouldn't closing threads push them off the page faster? People post in Off Topic threads every day, just about, and I would think if they didn't, it wouldn't really be too important to push old tournament threads off the page, would it?Brainstorming. Need input.
Up until now, I have been creating threads for members to vote in specific rounds. Doing so provided permanent source threads for anyone to review after the round ended.
Unfortunately, my handiwork is creating a lot more threads that do not flow off the Off-Topic front page as quickly as I want. The forum has good traffic but not a lot of original thread creation, which would normally push old threads down each forum page faster. lol. I would not care if this happened on the Fan Zone, where 10 billion new but same-old Prescott threads are created every day.
I am considering a single thread for voting. After each round ends, I would copy-and-paste its results, along with graphic brackets, into a follow-up post within that same thread. The previous poll used for voting would be deleted and replaced with a new poll. Same process. Single source thread. Less forum clutter.
Thoughts?
And I promise I will give you the stink eye, @big dog cowboy , if you post, "Well! Why didn't you THINK of doing that already???"
Nope. I automatically close each thread after use, even the idea threads are locked when finished.
I am buying you a pair of brand new blue suede shoes. If those are not the perfect Christmas gift, nothing is.
it is.
It's been a long time, but I really was hooked on Friday Night Lights.
Oh, I see. You don't want to have a thread count like Egyptian Cotton....or @Reverend Conehead . LolNope. I automatically close each thread after use, even the idea threads are locked when finished.
Here is the thing. You are 100% correct. People do post in Off-Topic threads every day. Unfortunately, those particular threads are usually those that already exist. New threads would jump ABOVE the closed threads AND join threads that everyone has been posting in every day already.
It is all about clutter, likely does not make anyone else give a second thought. Me? I say to myself, "Good gravy! There are DallasEast threads all over the front page! Dang that guy! Dang him to death!!!"
