Trade McFadden to Vikes?

McFadden doesn't have much value, we'd be lucky to get a 6th round pick so why even bother? It looks like there's going to be some growing pains with Zeke so we might need him at some point. Almost 1100 yards in 10 starts last year considering the offenses we where throwing out there last year is nothing to sneeze at
It was 1089 in 16 games not 10. If you are only going to talk about his games started you can't use all his yards for the entire year.

Not only that he doesn't score TDs. Yards mean nothing if you can't put 7 on the board
 
Problem is I don't think DMC warrants much return.
RBs got hit hard by the injury bug yesterday.

Jonathan Stewart in Carolina (hamstring)
Woodhead in San Diego (ACL)
Doug Martin in Tampa Bay (hamstring)
Ameer Abdullah in Detroit (foot sprain)
Arian Foster in Miami (groin; Ajayi is injured too)
Thomas Rawls in Seattle (leg contusion)
Adrian Peterson in Minnesota (ACL) (McKinnon/Asiata will fill in fine)

I will say this, Dallas loading up w/ 4 RBs on the active roster + DMC now looks a little smart.

I think keeping things & the roster as they are is the better option for now. DMC's value could go up.
 
McFadden is terrible. No one would want him.
He is also on the NFI and can't even practice until after Week 6 at the earliest........besides the fact he isn't better than any street FAs out there

He is on the team because we don't have to pay him while on the NFI
 
It was 1089 in 16 games not 10. If you are only going to talk about his games started you can't use all his yards for the entire year.

Not only that he doesn't score TDs. Yards mean nothing if you can't put 7 on the board
Everyone can agree that EE is off to bad start but he is on pace for 1072 yards and 16 TDs

Makes DMC's 1089 and 3 TDs as mediocre as they were
 
i can't explain it because I don't want to get banned however if you could not figure it out that only reinforces what I said

So stay home for the next few decades
I drive truck and go every where. I will say it anywhere
 
Everyone can agree that EE is off to bad start but he is on pace for 1072 yards and 16 TDs

Makes DMC's 1089 and 3 TDs as mediocre as they were
I don't think Zeke is off to a bad start. He has scored a TD in every game so far
 
Just out of curiosity, which top 10 quarterbacks would you put above Brady?
Montana, Marino, Staubach, Manning, Young, Aikman, Elway, Favre, Unitas, Tarkenton......just off the top of my head and it's not in order by the way.

Brady isn't even the best in the league right now. Rodgers is better
 
From my understanding we can't trade him till after week 6 anyway, and he has to pop onto our active roster first also. I doubt you get much for him, probably a conditional pick in the 6th round range. It's probably still worth it because he just doesn't fit on the team currently.
 
It was 1089 in 16 games not 10. If you are only going to talk about his games started you can't use all his yards for the entire year.

Not only that he doesn't score TDs. Yards mean nothing if you can't put 7 on the board

He ran for 960 yards in 10 starts, averaging 96 yards/game and a 4.75 YPC.

Your statistical shell game backfired on you.
 
Montana, Marino, Staubach, Manning, Young, Aikman, Elway, Favre, Unitas, Tarkenton......just off the top of my head and it's not in order by the way.

Brady isn't even the best in the league right now. Rodgers is better

Oh, you're talking about all-time.
It's hard to argue all-time because there are so many good quarterbacks.
Nevertheless, thanks for answering my question.
 
You're a sheep to ESPN. Tony Romo would have 4 or more if he played for the mastermind.

Aikman has 3 Super Bowls. Plunkett has 2. Teams win chips, not just overrated quarterbacks.

Tom Brady is blessed to qb that team. Put him in Cleveland, let's see how many SB he wins!

Are you serious?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,612
Messages
13,822,037
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top