Truly excited about the 2014 offense

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
A lot of people probably figured that I was down on the team based on a couple of threads I've made recently discussing observations I've made about the defense or the 2012 draft. This is not the case at all.

I think this team is probably in the best shape it's been in since 2012, which I guess isn't saying all that much, but it is saying that as a Cowboy fan, this is the most excited I've been for Cowboys football in about two years. I'm glad the front office made moves to get younger on the defensive line, and I think it's probably best that they redo this entire defense from the core out. There really isn't much left anyways. Most of the week 1 starters wont' have been on the Cowboys for more than a year or two.

That brings me to my main point: The Offense. I'm beyond excited about what this offense can bring to the table. I think it mainly relies on Tony Romo being healthy, but assuming he is healthy, I'm calling it right now, he will be an early 2014 MVP candidate.

I would like to draw parallels with the Cowboys Offense and the Patriots offense. I think the biggest thing separating these two offenses has been offensive line play (and more so than QB play). Tom Brady has had one of the best offensive lines in football for the majority of his career... Romo has not. If you give Brady, Romo's offensive line, you would see his career QB rating drop 10-15 points. I believe that is a testament to the quality of player Tony Romo is.

If you look at the history of the Patriots, you see that 2007 was a a special year for them. They went from being a good offense to being a great offense. What happened? Their QB and their offensive line good the offensive weapons necessary to help take them to a higher level. We've worked in the reverse, where we had the QB and the weapons, but never really had the line. After the patriots gave up on Randy Moss, Brady wouldn't be able to replicate his 2007 efficiency until 2010 (note that he missed a year due to injury). He would never get close to that 50 td mark again, but you saw marked improvement with the additions of Gronkowski and Hernandez. But what have we seen in the last couple years? His line has begun to age, and without weapons like Gronkowski, Hernandez, and Welker, he has been brought back down to earth. His 25 touchdowns he had last year are the lowest he's had since 2006 (when he had 24).

I believe Romo is looking at a 40+ Touchdown year if he can stay healthy. I think he has the best offensive line he has ever had, and one that has potential to be one of the best in the league. I think he has a running back who when given the rock and blocking can be a top 5 running back in this league. I think Dunbar can be explosive similar to Darren Sproles when given the chances and when healthy. I think our two tight end system can be almost as dynamic as the Patriots had with Gronkowski and Hernandez. I think that Cole Beasley is going to make a name for himself similar to how Wes Welker did, when he is given the opportunity. Already I think we have an offense that is just as good as the 2010 and 2011 Patriots. But what do we have that they didn't have? Well as I already mentioned we should have a running game, but more importantly we have Dez Bryant and Terrence Williams. It would have been difficult for any of the Patriots outside receivers to make this team from 2010-11. I'd give Street the nod over Branch just because of age and potential.

What I'm hoping allows us to put all this together is an offensive coordinator who actually has a track record of using their offensive weapons properly.

Linehan used Moss and Johnson properly. There is no reason why he shouldn't be able to use Dez.

Linehan used Jackson and Bush properly. There is no reason why he shouldn't be able to use Murray and Dunbar.

Linehan also has experience running 12 formations. We should expect big things from Gavin Escobar this year.

And though I can't necessarily put a claim to this, but I can't help but think that Linehan will use Beasley significantly this year, and people will suggest that he is the next Wes Welker by the end of the year (hopefully we re-sign him before that).

If you give Romo time, and the support of the running game, it's going to be impossible to stop guys like Beasley from getting open eventually. If healthy, I think this offense is going to roll teams like we've never seen consistently before. We've all seen glimpses though... the game against Denver last year, the game against Detroit, Buffalo, and St. Louis the year before that...

Everything comes down to this offensive line being what we think/hope it is.

I don't think we've every had such a fully flushed offense. It really does remind me of the Saints, Green Bay, and New England. So right now I'm envisioning the headlines now of Romo having an MVP season coming off of his second back surgery. The only thing that worries me is a defense that seems completely devoid of talent. And though I said to give up on it, maybe it'll show just enough to keep us in contention. I didn't mean that we should give up on the season, but we do have to do a major revamping of this defense next year.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
I totally agree. I got laughed at a few months ago when I made some threads saying I think we might have the most talented offense in the NFL. Of course, there are two things that concern me: 1) Romo's back, and 2) if the coaches will get the most out of our players. But talent wise, I think we have the best in the league. I really can't find any flaws from a talent perspective. A healthy Murray with a coach who runs the ball is a top 5 RB. Romo is a top 5 QB if his back holds up. Dez is top 3 this year, I think he makes the leap. The O-line is top 2, maybe the best. Some teams may have better single players, like QB or TE, but I can find holes in every other team. I think this offense is the most complete in the league. That being said, I see a worse defense than last year and another 8-8 record.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
I totally agree. I got laughed at a few months ago when I made some threads saying I think we might have the most talented offense in the NFL. Of course, there are two things that concern me: 1) Romo's back, and 2) if the coaches will get the most out of our players. But talent wise, I think we have the best in the league. I really can't find any flaws from a talent perspective. A healthy Murray with a coach who runs the ball is a top 5 RB. Romo is a top 5 QB if his back holds up. Dez is top 3 this year, I think he makes the leap. The O-line is top 2, maybe the best. Some teams may have better single players, like QB or TE, but I can find holes in every other team. I think this offense is the most complete in the league. That being said, I see a worse defense than last year and another 8-8 record.

Yeah, you really couldn't ask for more when it comes to offense. This team is stacked at nearly every position. I think a lot of people will be sad when we don't carry 6 wide receivers or 4 halfbacks. There will be a couple of skill position players who just won't be able to make this team, and a lot of that is on the defense, but also since we're stacked on offense.
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
I'm not sure we have the most talented offense in the league, but I think we have an offense that actually fits together very well. Dez is a very good to great WR. Witten is still a highly useful TE. Murray is a good back when he can stay on the field. The line should be close to elite. Romo is probably the most maligned nearly elite QB in the league, at least for much of his career. I think its going to come down to how does Williams and Escobar develop. If they take a good step then we very well might have too many weapons to cover.

I still think we're going to be a pass first offense, and I think that makes sense as our best weapons are still WR/TE. I hope that we see a more balanced attack. I think the biggest threat to us having a balanced attack is actually the defense. If the defense can't hold serve occasionally then we almost have to start throwing all over the place to keep up.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
I'm not sure we have the most talented offense in the league, but I think we have an offense that actually fits together very well. Dez is a very good to great WR. Witten is still a highly useful TE. Murray is a good back when he can stay on the field. The line should be close to elite. Romo is probably the most maligned nearly elite QB in the league, at least for much of his career. I think its going to come down to how does Williams and Escobar develop. If they take a good step then we very well might have too many weapons to cover.

I still think we're going to be a pass first offense, and I think that makes sense as our best weapons are still WR/TE. I hope that we see a more balanced attack. I think the biggest threat to us having a balanced attack is actually the defense. If the defense can't hold serve occasionally then we almost have to start throwing all over the place to keep up.


The thing about having a great offense is that it will allow the defense to play a lot looser and riskier, especially as opposing offenses become one dimensional.

If you look at the schedule and most teams in the NFL, you'll see that having an overpowering offense usually gives you the W, even if your defense isn't great.
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
The thing about having a great offense is that it will allow the defense to play a lot looser and riskier, especially as opposing offenses become one dimensional.

If you look at the schedule and most teams in the NFL, you'll see that having an overpowering offense usually gives you the W, even if your defense isn't great.

I agree.

I also think its possible we're playing several of the worst offenses in the NFL this year also, and outside of Philly no one in the division that I think will be a better offense then ours. Philly I don't know what to think about; they have to alter the offense some for the loss of Jackson. I see major questions for the Giants and Skins on both sides of the ball and the Eagles on defense. I don't think the Rams, Jags and possibly the Texans will have a legit NFL offense. I think we're actually pretty well equipped to win track meets, which is what we have to hope we get into a lot of. And then if we have a late lead we should be able to run enough to put it away.
 

junk

I've got moxie
Messages
9,294
Reaction score
247
I don't think the offense has achieved its potential for several years. I think coaching has held them back.

Put a below average OC like Callahan in charge (and jerk him around all year) and they still end up as a top 5 scoring offense. Imagine what they might be able to do if they put a competent OC in charge (and keep Garrett's fingers out of the mix). I'm just concerned because Linehan doesn't have a great track record and is a Garrett pal.

They need to commit to the run. Linehan did get 7 TDs out of an big, undrafted TE in Fauria, so maybe he can get some value out of Escobar.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,666
Reaction score
86,212
Bolstered oline, vets at the skill spots, Garrett being stripped of playcalling.... All signs are pointed up.


The defense will just be so bad though that it is going to be hard to be our usual 8-8 selves.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,120
Reaction score
11,476
The offense should be spectacular. We should be playing with leads most of the year, which helps everyone.

That's why I'm a little surprised some are so down on our chances this year. Yes, the D will be bad, but that's only half the game. The O should be great. It'll help having Garrett's hands out of the mix.

All dependent on Romo's back, of course.
 
Top