Turnovers

Aven8

Well-Known Member
Messages
31,948
Reaction score
52,086
When the heck are we going to decide to get some?!? Besides our own.

This team has been plagued for years with none of them. With this offense, and short fields this team would thrive. Was it Wade, players, Rob, players, Campo, player, what is it? We suck at it!
 
We just don't have any play making defensive backs. Guys like Mo, Carr, and Jenkins are good cover guys, not really ball hawks.
 
Cowboys&LakersFan;4735992 said:
We just don't have any play making defensive backs. Guys like Mo, Carr, and Jenkins are good cover guys, not really ball hawks.

Ummmm, Mo and Carr are both ball hawks, especially Mo.
 
Carter had one bounce of his hands in the first half. It might have a pick six.
 
Cowboys&LakersFan;4735992 said:
We just don't have any play making defensive backs. Guys like Mo, Carr, and Jenkins are good cover guys, not really ball hawks.

Jenkins is.......Carr IDK about besides preseason where he did get ints.......Mo should be so buddy ur just flat wrong
 
Mo is a rookie and Carr is playing in a new system. I think turnovers will come once they settle in.

But... turnovers have a lot to do with the defense putting pressure on a QB and making him make poor decisions, something we didnt do at all vs Seattle.
 
We haven't created them in years. When is the last time when we got a game changing quick scoring opportunity TO?
 
Mr Cowboy;4736003 said:
Carter had one bounce of his hands in the first half. It might have a pick six.

Totally forgot about that, man.. that could've changed the game right there.
 
Cowboys&LakersFan;4735992 said:
We just don't have any play making defensive backs. Guys like Mo, Carr, and Jenkins are good cover guys, not really ball hawks.

lol, you crack me up mr. "Classy"
 
Aven8;4736041 said:
We haven't created them in years. When is the last time when we got a game changing quick scoring opportunity TO?

I think it was when we played the Colts in Indianapolis 2 years ago (?). I think that's right...

Edit: When Lee and Scandrick had those two picks, and one or both of them were returned for TDs.
 
Uhm, no one can read what I've said in the past 850 threads about this?

NO ONE IS THROWING TO THEM

Every flipping throw is to Sensy/Mccray/Silva/Lee/Carter/Connor/Spencer.

Mo didn't allow ONE completion all game. He's had 4 completions for 38 yards in 2. Seriously can you guys NOT understand that?
 
Cowboys&LakersFan;4735992 said:
We just don't have any play making defensive backs. Guys like Mo, Carr, and Jenkins are good cover guys, not really ball hawks.

Go here CowboyLaker
 
Joshmil53;4736100 said:
Uhm, no one can read what I've said in the past 850 threads about this?

NO ONE IS THROWING TO THEM

Every flipping throw is to Sensy/Mccray/Silva/Lee/Carter/Connor/Spencer.

Mo didn't allow ONE completion all game. He's had 4 completions for 38 yards in 2. Seriously can you guys NOT understand that?

Exactly. And when the ball does go there way, it is thrown somewhere where they are not able to make a play on the ball. Getting to the QB more often will force more errant throws and turnovers.
 
To create turnovers, you must first put pressure in the QB face, like Seattle did to Romo.

We don't cause enough havoc at the line of scrimmage.

QB's have it pretty easy against are DL... Even when our DL is playing well, its not exactly like we overwhelm the QB.
 
Gameover;4736177 said:
To create turnovers, you must first put pressure in the QB face, like Seattle did to Romo.

We don't cause enough havoc at the line of scrimmage.

QB's have it pretty easy against are DL... Even when our DL is playing well, its not exactly like we overwhelm the QB.

Exactly we shouldnt have to constantly blitz to get pressure but thats the only way we can sniff the QB and even then its only Ware when he doesnt dissapear!
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,751
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top