Section446
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,887
- Reaction score
- 11,534
Seems like he's just reading what was said about him pre-draft: lots of talent, just needs to grow up.
I guess that would depend on the effort and determination of the jag player. Is he an underachiever or an overachiever.I dont care about validation from a jag player
as a rookie?????? I mean M Collins had 5 sacks his rookie year, where's he now? I guess I'm saying sacks don't always tell the whole pic.I wish I could believe this, but it is a friend with a very bias view of him telling us that. We will see, if he had like 5-6 sacks this year I would be in awe with how far he has come from.
There was only 14 or 15 DTs who had 5 or more sacks last year. I mean I guess you're saying you'd be in awe, but that's just an unrealistic expectation in general. Fans overall really don't have fair expectations for DT sack numbers and, on the fip side, wildly over-value the high numbers (i.e. Jordan Phillips). Hill is a great pick if he ends up being a guy who gets you 3.5 a year.I wish I could believe this, but it is a friend with a very bias view of him telling us that. We will see, if he had like 5-6 sacks this year I would be in awe with how far he has come from.
Look at these likes dog. Dont you have a Romo poster to make love to?As opposed to a comment by a jag message board poster?
Im just keeping it 100. Being honest hurts ppls feelings around here
You are brutal towards TC!
No but they are the only opinions that matter.What, only all pro players can give opinions?
Lol nothing wrong with a cougar every now and againYeah, Jaguars suck! I heard you like Cougars!! Lol
I hope Hill does take advantage of his opportunities because I dont want label him as another wasted pick. On another note it sounds like Crawford is a bit of a mentor to the young guys which can help this team.
Bill Belichick was less than JAG as a player ...I dont care about validation from a jag player
I strongly disagree with this.I dont care about validation from a jag player
Bill Belichick was less than JAG as a player ...
The ability to learn things about another player isn't somehow limited to star players. In fact, sometimes those that aren't stars see and learn more because they have had to pay attention to details to get by as a player. That's a big reason why a lot of great coaches were not high quality players.
I was trying to be nice it's fridayI strongly disagree with this.
Crawford has to make a few plays to elevate himself to JAG status.
You're being generous.
Yeah, that was a pretty pathetic statement.What, only all pro players can give opinions?
Let's talk when ty craw becomes a great talent evaluator after we cut him.Bill Belichick was less than JAG as a player ...
The ability to learn things about another player isn't somehow limited to star players. In fact, sometimes those that aren't stars see and learn more because they have had to pay attention to details to get by as a player. That's a big reason why a lot of great coaches were not high quality players.
That doesn't even make sense. You didn't indicate he shouldn't be listened to because only a proven "great talent evaluator" should be listened to, you indicated he shouldn't be listened to because he isn't a great player. Clearly history proves that it doesn't take a great player to learn about other players, and your response doesn't dispute that.Let's talk when ty craw becomes a great talent evaluator after we cut him.
Seems like he's just reading what was said about him pre-draft: lots of talent, just needs to grow up.