You simply won't let go of the article 46 will you? The judge fully said yesterday. "This case isn't like the Tom Brady case." I really don't know what else you need to see to stop with your repetitive angle on this. It's actually getting oldThat pretty much summed up the argument from a common sense standpoint.
I'll let you read what I wrote again and get back to me.You simply won't let go of the article 46 will you? The judge fully said yesterday. "This case isn't like the Tom Brady case." I really don't know what else you need to see to stop with your repetitive angle on this. It's actually getting old
That pretty much summed up the argument from a common sense standpoint.
Common sense tells me silencing your lead investigator, withholding her notes and opinion for the investigative report is grounds for misconduct and exposes procedural flaws and denial of fundamental fairness.
By reading all of your comments. Coming to my own conclusion. Much like the NFL has in this situation. Not fun when its you is it? LolI'll let you read what I wrote again and get back to me.
How in the world did you read all that into my single comment? LOL
All I meant was that this debate actually summed up the situation from both sides of the fence. That's all.By reading all of your comments. Coming to my own conclusion. Much like the NFL has in this situation. Not fun when its you is it? Lol
And withholding evidence and hiding a doctor in their home is normal procedure? The judge said himself this isn't the Brady case. You just don't want to admit article 46 has no bearing here lolAll I meant was that this debate actually summed up the situation from both sides of the fence. That's all.
I side with Zeke on this, but I also understand what the CBA means.
People think this case will be tried like a domestic violence court case. That won't even be discussed. It'll be about procedure only. Kessler has to prove that procedure was not followed in a fair manner.
Whether Zeke did it or not is not even going to come up again.
Article 46 has ALL the bearing here, but that clause requires a level of fairness that I don't think the league applied. Hence, your examples.And withholding evidence and hiding a doctor in their home is normal procedure? The judge said himself this isn't the Brady case. You just don't want to admit article 46 has no bearing here lol
I'll let you read what I wrote again and get back to me.
How in the world did you read all that into my single comment? LOL
Shannon Sharpe and others need to realize Article 46 is not the the end all be all everyone is making it out to be. I will keep posting this every time someone brings up Article 46 as the endgame.
Per Daniel Wallach, a lawyer:
"Under Section 10(a)(3) of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA), federal courts can vacate an arbitration award where "the arbitrators were guilty of [any] misconduct . . . by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced, thereby amount[ing] to a denial of [a party's right] to fundamental fairness of the arbitration proceeding." Tempo Shain Corp. v. Bertek, Inc., 120 F.3d 16, 19-20 (2d Cir.
Article 46 does not protect the NFL when there is misconduct done. NFLPA could not prove misconduct in the Tom Brady case. NFL did not try to silence the lead investigator in the Brady case. The whole business with Kia Roberts is ground for misconduct. NFL is on shaky ground here.