Updated draft order

[Nors]

Our Brown pick is now #24 - yikes


UPDATED 2008 1st-ROUND DRAFT: SELECTION ORDER


November 27, 2007

(Ed. note: Selection order based on current record and combined W-L record of all opponents.)

#
Team
W-L
Opponents'
W-L %

1 Miami
0-11 .534


2T New York Jets
2-9
.523


2T St. Louis 2-9
.523

4
New England (from San Francisco) 3-8
.466

5
Atlanta 3-8
.506

6
Oakland 3-8
.517


7 Cincinnati 4-7
.472

8T
Kansas City
4-7
.500

8T
Baltimore 4-7 .500

10 Carolina 4-7 .540

11
Arizona 5-6
.438

12 New Orleans 5-6
.472

13
Buffalo
5-6
.506

14 Houston 5-6
.511

15T Minnesota 5-6
.528

15T Denver 5-6 .528

17
Chicago 5-6
.563

18T Washington 5-6
.568

18T
Philadelphia 5-6
.568

20 Tennessee 6-5
.494

21
San Diego 6-5
.528

22 Detroit 6-5
.551

23
Seattle 7-4 .409

24
Dallas (from Cleveland) 7-4
.426

25 Tampa Bay 7-4
.455

26
New York Giants 7-4
.511

27 Pittsburgh 8-3
.443

28 Jacksonville 8-3
.511

29
San Francisco (from Indianapolis) 9-2
.511

30
Green Bay 10-1
.472

31 Dallas 10-1
.477

32
New England (pick forfeited)
11-0
.449

 

[big dog cowboy]

Three months ago if you had said the Cleveland pick would be #24 not a single person alive would have believed it. Unreal.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

sucks.

 

[Nors]

sucks.

Yes - top 5 pick no longer in play but for our needs,

RB,CB,WR - there will be value there.

 

[Hoofbite]

Three months ago if you had said the Cleveland pick would be #24 not a single person alive would have believed it. Unreal.

Very true and very frustrating. At the same time, if you were to give me the option of trading a mid-late 1st rounder for an early 2nd rounder and a future first, Im jumping on that like nobodies business.

Dallas has been a little snake bitten when it comes to trading with loser teams and then seeing that team win some games but I would do it every year that I could. If someone came knocking and wanted to move into that Cleveland spot and offered up a 2nd and next years 1st, done deal.

 

[Biggems]

I would like SF to win 2-3 more games at least.....and have Oakland, Atlanta, Baltimore, and Carolina continue to suck.

BTW.....if Washington loses out, does anyone see them going after FS Kenny Phillips in the draft? I don't mean to come across as cold, but they do have a glaring hole at FS now, and what they currently have on the roster will definitely not do.

 

[Sasquatch]

Very true and very frustrating. At the same time, if you were to give me the option of trading a mid-late 1st rounder for an early 2nd rounder and a future first, Im jumping on that like nobodies business.

Dallas has been a little snake bitten when it comes to trading with loser teams and then seeing that team win some games but I would do it every year that I could. If someone came knocking and wanted to move into that Cleveland spot and offered up a 2nd and next years 1st, done deal.

It was a shrewd move with minimal risk and potential for a huge coup. We'll still get something worthwhile out of the pick even if it's trading out of the first for a second and another first for 2009.

 

[Boys009]

Anyone else upset that NE will get a top 5 pick?

 

[jjaw]

Anyone else upset that NE will get a top 5 pick?

Yes, the commish totally screwed up by not taking the highest of the two from the Pats

 

[ayjackson]

Anyone else upset that NE will get a top 5 pick?

Not if they're our trading partner.

 

[ayjackson]

Yes, the commish totally screwed up by not taking the highest of the two from the Pats

The new commish screws up on almost a daily basis. The overreaction to spygate was just the beginning. Parcels, Reeves, Jimmy Johnson - they all admit it is overblown and the practice (or similar illegal practices) are commonplace. Can't we move on?