burmafrd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,820
- Reaction score
- 3,379
Hoofbite;4413030 said:Good point.
Saw a figure that says that the pressure in the deepest parts is like 8 tons per square inch.
Factor in the temp down there and things may not hold up.
And even if they could, how heavy would the encasement be? That much concrete and that much steel? How would you move something like that out there?
It's not like a giant platform rig that you could use buoyancy to lighten the load. We're talking a solid structure completely sealed and filled with nuclear waste.
How big would it have to be?
81,000 meters cubed? After some fiddling around, it would be about this big.
A box 160 feet wide, 120 long and 150 feet tall.
A visual depiction.
http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y188/thehoofbite/dallas-cowboys-stadium-trapassocopy.jpg
That box is sideline-to-sideline and that is just what it would have to hold, not the actual size itself. That's internal volume.
And actually, I shorted the height by about 15 feet but didn't want to fix it. You'd have to imagine about 10 feet of visible screen.
Every year? I don't think dumping it in the sea would even be feasible.
as usual those stories are sensationalized and probably for a reason.
90% of radioactive waste is relatively harmless in a few years. Only a very small amount is dangerous for a long time
This is not liquid; it would be solid. It is not all that hard to make containers to stand up to the pressures of the deep. You are not enclosing a capsule of air- which is a lot tougher.