Vela: A. Jones, CB Rankings and Ken Hamlin’s Best Position: K.C. Joyner Returns, Pt.1

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The football scientist K.C. Joyner gave BSR an interview Friday, taking time from finishing Scientific Football 2008 to discuss Adam Jones, the Cowboys incumbent corners, whether Ken Hamlin should be moved to strong safety and other topics. Today, we focus on the defense.

BSR: Adam Jones has finally landed in the Cowboys’ secondary. There’s a lot of discussion on the site about his ability to recover from a year off. I don’t think it’s an issue. He was suspended for being a knucklead. He didn’t miss time for a major injury or behavior that damaged his body, like drug or alcohol abuse. Paul Hornung and Alex Karras missed a full year in ‘63 for gambling. Both played well after they returned and they were both 28 the year they sat. Jones was 24. I think his performance curve can actually improve.

Joyner: I agree. Physiologists and baseball analysts like Bill James say that your physical peak comes around age 27 or 28. Don’t forget that John Riggins also sat out a year and helped win a Super Bowl after he returned.

BSR: I saw a comment from an AFC pro personnel guy who said Jones has talent but was inconsistent while at Tennessee. How much can we expect him to add to the secondary this year?

Joyner: Remember, he’s replacing Jacques Reeves. Reeves had a 7.9 yards per attempt in ‘07. Now, a 7.0 YPA is about league average. Adam Jones had a 5.4 YPA in 2006 (which ranked 8th overall). Jones doesn’t have to equal that to be an improvement. Even if he’s a notch below his ‘06 play he’ll raise the secondary’s play.

As for being inconsistent, you don’t post a 5.4 YPA giving up a lot of big plays. He may have given up a decent throw here and there, but you can’t give up many and post a number like that.

BSR: How did the Cowboys’ regular corners rate?

Joyner: Anthony Henry had a 6.6 YPA. That’s in the top third. Terence Newman had a 6.2 YPA. That’s in the top 20. The Cowboys had a top ten secondary with Reeves starting 13 games. They should be as good or better with Jones.

[Note: Joyner didn't have his rankings handy, but he's on the mark. A 6.2 YPA ranked 15th in both the '05 and '06 CB ratings. A 6.6 YPA ranked 21st and 20th in those years. ]

BSR: There’s been a lot of speculation that the Cowboys will move to Anthony Henry to free safety and Ken Hamlin to strong safety, putting Roy Williams on the bench. Henry hinted at this when Jones got some reps at starting right corner in last week’s mini-camp. But Hamlin was very good at free safety last year. Would Dallas be messing with success to move him?
Joyner: Before Ken Hamlin the Cowboys were awful at free safety. [Note: Keith Davis and Pat Watkins had the worst pass coverage numbers for starting FSs in '05 and '06.]

I think Dallas might be creating one problem by trying to solve another one. I don’t have his stats but Hamlin was very, very good last year. If the Cowboys want to replace Roy Williams at strong safety, they should get another strong safety. Look, I don’t have any problems saying this on the record. I think Roy Williams is just one of those guys, like Randy Moss, who’s going to play his game, the game that he wants to play, no matter what.

BSR: Let’s look at the Dallas secondary in comparison to another top divisional unit. I’ve written a couple of pieces on the NFC and I have the Eagles as my bubble team; I’m putting them outside the playoffs but can see them in if they keep Lito Sheppard. How good can Philly’s secondary be if they keep him?

Joyner: Lito dropped off. He takes chances and has high YPAs but the Eagles put up with it because he made plays and got picks. He’s stopped doing that.

BSR: What did Asante Samuel post last year?

Joyner: He was 7.2. Good, but not great.

I think the Eagles suffered letting nickel back Rod Hood go. He posted a 6.6 YPA for Arizona, which is very respectable. They replaced him with William James, who had a YPA over 11.0 last year, which is one of the worst marks in the league.

Come back Monday for Part II, where K.C. will discuss Tony Romo’s ‘07, the difficult matchups he faces in ‘08, Patrick Crayton’s value as a number two and whether rumored WR target Joe Horn has anything left.

Written by Rafael Vela · Filed Under Interviews
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,865
Reaction score
11,566
Joyner: Remember, he’s replacing Jacques Reeves. Reeves had a 7.9 yards per attempt in ‘07. Now, a 7.0 YPA is about league average.

Thank god we don't have to see that guy play in a Dallas uniform again.

Joyner: Before Ken Hamlin the Cowboys were awful at free safety. [Note: Keith Davis and Pat Watkins had the worst pass coverage numbers for starting FSs in '05 and '06.]

Anyone saying that Hamlin was a product of the system take note.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
I do not accept all of Joyners conclusions since I think he has tunnel vision about numbers and forgets to factor in other non number types of data, but
a lot of the areas he concentrates on are very valid in evaluating players.
We got a gomer somewhere around here that insists Watkins is every bit as good as Hamlin is.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
burmafrd;2131444 said:
I do not accept all of Joyners conclusions since I think he has tunnel vision about numbers and forgets to factor in other non number types of data, but
a lot of the areas he concentrates on are very valid in evaluating players.
We got a gomer somewhere around here that insists Watkins is every bit as good as Hamlin is.

I think his analysis gives a decent ballpark. Generally if he says this player was good or bad or fair, he's probably correct. I actually find when he's off it's usually due to him not figuing in enough stats. For example, he loves to work off YPA, but hypothetically a corner can give up a much higher YPA, but give up much less yards per game.



YAKUZA
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,985
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WoodysGirl;2131326 said:
I think the Eagles suffered letting nickel back Rod Hood go. He posted a 6.6 YPA for Arizona, which is very respectable. They replaced him with William James, who had a YPA over 11.0 last year, which is one of the worst marks in the league.
William "FIRST DOWN!" James. If that's not a gaping hole in your nickel defense, nothing is.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Interesting that he thinks we NEED a typical strong safety, rather than two coverage safeties.

Goes against current conventional wisdom.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
WoodysGirl;2131326 said:
Joyner: Look, I don’t have any problems saying this on the record. I think Roy Williams is just one of those guys, like Randy Moss, who’s going to play his game, the game that he wants to play, no matter what.

Ouch.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,485
Thehoofbite;2131426 said:
Thank god we don't have to see that guy play in a Dallas uniform again.



Anyone saying that Hamlin was a product of the system take note.

Uh, the numbers for Davis and Watkins were when Bill was running the show.... He wasn't using numbers about when Wade was running the show...... But Keith Davis sucks... I'm still undecided on Watkins...
 

DBoys

New Member
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
0
theogt;2131861 said:
Interesting that he thinks we NEED a typical strong safety, rather than two coverage safeties.

Goes against current conventional wisdom.

Good point. Seems like the game has changed and you no longer need a physical SS but a coverage guy.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
khiladi;2131884 said:
Uh, the numbers for Davis and Watkins were when Bill was running the show.... He wasn't using numbers about when Wade was running the show...... But Keith Davis sucks... I'm still undecided on Watkins...

219 pass yards per game in 2006

213 pass yards per game in 2007

So yardage-wise there really isn't much of a difference between Wade's show and Bill's.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
Thehoofbite;2131426 said:
Anyone saying that Hamlin was a product of the system take note.

I haven't seen that said a whole lot...but Hamlin started in a different system than the other two.
 

Disturbed

A Mere Flesh Wound
Messages
1,451
Reaction score
6
abersonc;2131896 said:
219 pass yards per game in 2006

213 pass yards per game in 2007

So yardage-wise there really isn't much of a difference between Wade's show and Bill's.

The main difference was where the weaknesses were exploited. When the talent level is suspect in several areas it is hard to see all the real problems, but when the talent increases you can easily identify the remaining issues.

The coaching staff needs to take care of a few remaining concerns, and then prepare to kick some tail this year.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
Yakuza Rich;2131496 said:
Hypothetically a corner can give up a much higher YPA, but give up much less yards per game.
Per-game stats get brushed aside way too often.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
abersonc;2131896 said:
219 pass yards per game in 2006

213 pass yards per game in 2007

So yardage-wise there really isn't much of a difference between Wade's show and Bill's.
C'mon, now. That's a pretty silly straight up comparison even if you're looking at defense to defense, not to mention comparing one player to another. You're penalizing our defense for having a better offense in 2007.

How about:

6.4 yards per attempt in 2007 (6th in the NFL).

7.3 yards per attempt in 2006 (26th in the NFL).

The pass defense was tremendously improved from '06 to '07, and that's with WORSE starting corners. When it comes to X's and O's, Bill Parcells is a mental midget compared to Wade Phillips.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
theogt;2132350 said:
C'mon, now. That's a pretty silly straight up comparison even if you're looking at defense to defense, not to mention comparing one player to another. You're penalizing our defense for having a better offense in 2007.

How about:

6.4 yards per attempt in 2007 (6th in the NFL).

7.3 yards per attempt in 2006 (26th in the NFL).

The pass defense was tremendously improved from '06 to '07, and that's with WORSE starting corners. When it comes to X's and O's, Bill Parcells is a mental midget compared to Wade Phillips.

Did I not say "yardage-wise"?

Per attempt is fine -- but when you limit attempts (581 in 2007 vs. 511 in 2006) then you've got another piece of the story.

You can call it D -- or it could be the fact that a better O means that you force more passing. Certainly when the O knocks the stuffing out of a team and you force your Rex Grossmans to throw 32 passes, your Trent Greens to toss 40, face Bulger (broken ribs)/Gus Frerotte who throw 30 lame ducks, face incompetents in Tavaris Jackson and Kellen Clemons - then you've got some advantages that MAY be circumstantial
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Thehoofbite;2131426 said:
Thank god we don't have to see that guy play in a Dallas uniform again.



Anyone saying that Hamlin was a product of the system take note.

I don't think Reeves is a bad player. It was really his first year to start which is a big difference over playing the nickel and dime. He has good speed, will tackle, and has some skills as a CB. He was just a day late and a dollar short too often last year although he played well at times. I suspect some of that was our front seven getting pressure and the talent he was up against.

I think Reeves will be a starting journeyman CB/DB in some systems for several years. I don't want him here of a championship club. He's peaked for the most part. Sure he can get some better but he's finished climbing that sigmoidal curve and is on the very slowly sloped back end of it. He isn't getting better enough to make a big difference on a team like we have. Time was right for him to go. Miami and Texas would be a good place for him. Texas will likely work out for him if he can pull it off.

Hamlin needs to stay on at Strong safety as those guys are switching around back there as the situation dictates. Roy needs to be the majority of the time as the SS and Hamlin as the lesser role. He's a better FS by far than Roy. And he's close enough to Roy as a SS to make me proud. What they need to do is begin to work well together with that slippery slope of sorta both being SS and FS and switching back and forth as needed.

The biggest thing I want to see is having Henry at FS and Hamlin as SS, moving RW to a special LB role towards the front seven. If they can get that front six or seven set up with the right guys then finish out the DBs behind them we will have a very experienced talented team that can play DB and CB well, and specialized players in exact roles in the front seven along with a front 5 or 6 front line and LBs putting big time pressure on without leaving holes in the defense, we will have a scary defense that can pressure the qB, defeat any runs, quick outs, screens and draws, and still work the middle well, beat the TE, and pressure the ball and defense passes on a huge scale. We have the team that can shut down the enemy. We could be a very good team and be actually scary. And I prophetsize we can be a very dominant defensive team giving up few points, taking the ball away, stopping the run and just plain dominating teams.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
abersonc;2132405 said:
Did I not say "yardage-wise"?

Per attempt is fine -- but when you limit attempts (581 in 2007 vs. 511 in 2006) then you've got another piece of the story.

You can call it D -- or it could be the fact that a better O means that you force more passing. Certainly when the O knocks the stuffing out of a team and you force your Rex Grossmans to throw 32 passes, your Trent Greens to toss 40, face Bulger (broken ribs)/Gus Frerotte who throw 30 lame ducks, face incompetents in Tavaris Jackson and Kellen Clemons - then you've got some advantages that MAY be circumstantial
There's really no point in looking at a per game yardage at all. Particularly when there's such a wide gap in total attempts (70). It doesn't tell you a thing about the defense.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
abersonc;2132405 said:
Did I not say "yardage-wise"?

Per attempt is fine -- but when you limit attempts (581 in 2007 vs. 511 in 2006) then you've got another piece of the story.

You can call it D -- or it could be the fact that a better O means that you force more passing. Certainly when the O knocks the stuffing out of a team and you force your Rex Grossmans to throw 32 passes, your Trent Greens to toss 40, face Bulger (broken ribs)/Gus Frerotte who throw 30 lame ducks, face incompetents in Tavaris Jackson and Kellen Clemons - then you've got some advantages that MAY be circumstantial

Look around the league. We faced the same competition that every other team faced. In fact, our Defense's DVOA was adjusted downward, which means we faced slightly better than average quarterbacks, on average.

And theogt is correct. Looking at the per-game stats is basically meaningless when the number of attempts aren't that similar.
 

ndanger

Active Member
Messages
2,298
Reaction score
13
abersonc;2131896 said:
219 pass yards per game in 2006

213 pass yards per game in 2007

So yardage-wise there really isn't much of a difference between Wade's show and Bill's.

Big difference if you ask me. Teams in 07 were playing from behind and therefore would be more likely to post better averages. Wins and losses baby !
 
Top